What I still need is some clear pointers to where in the Geneva Conventions it says "Enemy Combatants have one year to declare themselves" etc.
Others seem to feel crystal clear on all of this, and I think there may be something to it, but the lack of direct hard evidence (i.e. simple places where certain assertions are based on) makes me wonder...
I trust or find Patel Patriot to be 1000 times more credible than JS.
One of the thing that irks me about the whole "LoW - one year" thing is that there seems to be a whole lot of assertions and conclusions being made without any clear evidence, quotes or factual backup (from anons or elsewhere), which feels like the opposite of Patel Patriot, who points always to evidence, quotes, facts and then draws some conclusions, but always contextualizes or qualifies them. (So far, anyway)
I also follow Patel. I find it interesting that he seemed to come out of nowhere and has this deep understanding of Devolution. And he still distances himself from Q. I wouldn't be surprised if he was put here by the White Hats.
I'm still not convinced, but at least some core ideas were clarified for me by listening to this video of Juan O'Savin.
Generally, I do not support or like o'Savin. I'm quite suspicious of him. Nonetheless, this podcast did clarify some of the ideas.
https://rumble.com/vsvc1c--jan-17-2021-juan-o-savin-w-spaceshot76-jan-20th-legal-marker-next-phase-is.html
What I still need is some clear pointers to where in the Geneva Conventions it says "Enemy Combatants have one year to declare themselves" etc.
Others seem to feel crystal clear on all of this, and I think there may be something to it, but the lack of direct hard evidence (i.e. simple places where certain assertions are based on) makes me wonder...
Thanks for your reply. I also don't trust Juan O'Savin but I'll listen to the interview.
Yeah. Me too. Meanwhile (I haven't listened to this yet, but: )
https://rumble.com/vsyhvd-patel-patriot-devolution-power-hour-11922.html
also
https://rumble.com/vsz5ev-patel-patriot-interviews-iet17-on-the-low-manual-and-more.html
I trust or find Patel Patriot to be 1000 times more credible than JS.
One of the thing that irks me about the whole "LoW - one year" thing is that there seems to be a whole lot of assertions and conclusions being made without any clear evidence, quotes or factual backup (from anons or elsewhere), which feels like the opposite of Patel Patriot, who points always to evidence, quotes, facts and then draws some conclusions, but always contextualizes or qualifies them. (So far, anyway)
I also follow Patel. I find it interesting that he seemed to come out of nowhere and has this deep understanding of Devolution. And he still distances himself from Q. I wouldn't be surprised if he was put here by the White Hats.