So it would appear.
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (208)
sorted by:
Perhaps you should take your own advice?
Couldn't figure out how to explain why race is used to denote sub-species of humans but breed is used to denote sub-species of canines? What about divisions of other species? Is "race" ever used to describe them?
Why would science change it's methodology unless the term "race" is simply a construct created by other humans?
We’re not talking about canines or felines or Protozoa or kingdoms, phylums, classes, orders or genera. The subject is races, of which there are three. You are free to disagree with that biological fact and sound like a rainbow-haired sodomite “the only race is the human race” if it makes you happy. You can continue to argue but it’ll be with yourself, as I have no more time for the silliness...and you can go snuggle up with some of these cutesy, fuzzy, warm memes. https://quotefancy.com/quote/1358787/Rosa-Parks-I-believe-there-is-only-one-race-the-human-race
Yes we are talking about them, because you came here claiming "race" is a legitimate biological term.
You set the standard.
The fact that "race" is being used to differentiate between humans but it's not being used when differentiating in other sub-species categories, shows to those with non-dull intellects that the term "race" is a human construct.