Apparently Trump pushed back. Here is the collusion he was up against:
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1484223625850875905/photo/2 https://files.catbox.moe/bwnx05.jpeg
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1484223625850875905/photo/1 https://files.catbox.moe/2be0l4.jpeg
Talking heads are like lawyers in that they will advocate for whoever is their client.
McEnany bad-mouthed Trump before she was working for him, was very good at defending him when working for him, but then went to work at FOX. After the sham election who was she working for? Who has Hannity really been working for?
Apparently they will say anything we want to hear so long as they can pull the strings against us when it counts.
Me too. It's like politics is just a performance art for some people.
Was the performance at the WH press podium where she controlled the message or is it on air on Fox's opinion shows where RINO execs control the message?
I'll grant that at least one is a performance given the inconsistency. Beyond that, you may just have to trust your gut. Mine suggests that you don't put together a whole binder worth of news clips and statements from prominent pundits all on your own, and it's not exactly labor free. She put a lot of effort into those performances. Did she care more about that one and invest more in it? Is Faux's money that much better? Or is it simply safer now that she's got a small child in the picture and doesn't want to be a daily, high-value political target?
I don't know the answers. I have my suspicions. You of course, must think for yourself.