2
OregonAngel2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the link. Read it.

2
OregonAngel2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he is talking about Israel using nuclear weapons.

There is a reason why they are setting up a secure location for 300,000 Israelis in Patagonia.

21
OregonAngel2 21 points ago +21 / -0

Even Clandestine is bewildered: "Alright, y’all are getting out of hand 😂 What the fuck is going on."

HAHAHA!

12
OregonAngel2 12 points ago +12 / -0

There are no fully quiet operations in the age of cellphones and cloud sourced investigative journalism.

Besides which...they seem to have no shame and flaunt their bloodthirsty dominance acts every chance they get. This is but one example.

16
OregonAngel2 16 points ago +16 / -0

Itamar Ben-Gvir is an Israeli lawyer and politician who leads the far-right party Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) and has served as Israel's Minister of National Security since late 2022.

So he's not just some guy. He is their National Security Minister.

9
OregonAngel2 9 points ago +9 / -0

The Silver belt and the Silver Plow. "The entire first line of Lebanese villages has been destroyed. We are destroying all the houses. The residents will never see them standing before their eyes again." - Israeli Defense Minister Katz bragging about war crimes on TV.

https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/187042 video subtitles

Israel Katz is an Israeli politician and member of the Knesset for Likud currently serving as Minister of Defense and a member of the Security Cabinet of Israel.

4
OregonAngel2 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Ceasefire Lasted 5 Minutes — Israel Strikes Nabatieh Right After It Started

Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire starting at 4 p.m. Friday, a senior US official told Reuters, with the US and Qatar brokering the deal and Iran assisting. Right before it kicked in, Israel carried out a massive wave of strikes. About five minutes after the deal was supposed to start, Israel hit Nabatieh al-Fawqa anyway (pictured).

Israel signed a ceasefire and broke it before the ink dried."

https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/187055

Well that took a whopping 5 minutes to violate.

1
OregonAngel2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kind of like how Claudia Sheinbaum, the President of Mexico, has a very odd name. There's probably some history there I do not know.

1
OregonAngel2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The movie is very well done. You might try that. It will also show you what Nessum Dorma really means... ; )

2
OregonAngel2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you! Isn't it strange that with everything going on with Iran and leadership being decapitated etc. that they would protest about college admissions as if everything were normal, with normal concerns.

1
OregonAngel2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was the actual sequence:

Israel (Netanyahu and his Defense Minister) announced they would destroy Southern Beirut and ordered people to leave. Hundreds of thousands of people live there. There was a massive exodus from southern Beirut with massive traffic gridlock. Iran said essential F this. We aren't talking with you Trump anymore about a deal while this is going on.
Trump called Netanyahu and cussed him out and told him to stop it. Trump then announced Netanyahu had called off the attack. Iran then agreed to resume negotiations.

The domestic news is only telling you one side. Shameful lack of real journalism...

Everybody needs Telegram. Uncensored.

Links: https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/70389 https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/70299 https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/70384

6
OregonAngel2 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's not what one would consider a reasoned or classy response. Care to refute her observations on its merits?

13
OregonAngel2 13 points ago +13 / -0

Something stinks in Kentucky.

Thomas Massie faced a primary opponent named Ed Gallrein — and Gallrein refused to do any debates.

Massie explained why Gallrein was shy around the media: “He’s afraid to take a position because he knows he doesn’t have positions.” In fact, Gallrein’s spokesperson could not even provide a reason for why Gallrein did not attend.

Gallrein also had very few supporters at his campaign events. Just a few days before the primary, Gallrein could not muster seven people to attend his one of his public appearances.

Seven people.

We also know that Gallrein had very few supporters at his victory party.

That’s not a guess. We have the video.

If Gallrein did beat Massie in a fair election then why did only 20 people show up to celebrate his win?

No voters at his campaign stops. No voters at his election party.

It’s obvious: Gallrein actually had very little support in his race.

Let’s consider another key metric in political campaigns: small-dollar donations. Such donations are widely considered a proxy for voter enthusiasm and support.

Based on donations, Massie had a large following of local support — while Gallrein had a much smaller following. Most of Gallrein's money came from outside the state and outside the United States.

Massie’s campaign raised money through donations that were smaller, but more numerous: the median contribution was $250 from more than 3,000 individual donors. For Gallrein, about 1,000 such donors contributed around $1,000 each.

So Massie’s grassroots donor support was three times the size of his opponent.

Why did this primary become the most expensive race in the history of Congress? “It’s because three billionaires from outside of Kentucky have funneled millions of dollars here to try to buy a seat,” according to Massie. Outside groups like American Israel Public Affairs Committee and the Republican Jewish Coalition spent tens of millions of dollars on attack ads against Massie too.

Still, that’s just money. And money doesn’t actually fill out the ballots, right?

Now in this primary, Massie supposedly got only 47,018 votes — and yet the crowd at his election party was ten times the size of Gallrein's.

Here’s a picture of Massie’s party on Primary Day. Notice the difference.

Pretty strange — isn’t it? A candidate with no voters easily beats an incumbent who has three times his small-dollar donations, ten times his crowds, and thirty times his social media followers.

Now let’s debunk the claim that Kentucky voters were simply sick and tired of Massie.

How do we know? Because Massie actually got more votes than he got in his 2024 primary.

And let’s remember the most important point: President Trump has told you for six years a simple truth: our voting machines are rigged.

Elon Musk has told you too.

And guess what: Kentucky uses voting machines.

That’s how we all know that elections in Kentucky are rigged too.

This is called: logic.

It’s time to use your common sense. Massie won.

see link here: https://www.emerald.tv/p/something-stinks-in-kentucky?

6
OregonAngel2 6 points ago +6 / -0

The vast majority in the country are Independent. Those registered Republican are not a representative sample.

Furthermore there were some shenanigans. Is Trump using their techniques against them? An eye for an eye? https://www.emerald.tv/p/something-stinks-in-kentucky?

2
OregonAngel2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not a handshake. I've been here since VOAT. I don't want to have America be a handmaiden to Israel.

2
OregonAngel2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Polymarket is just a measure of what people with money want:
"Hey, bet against Massie. We will make sure you win big. It's enough to pay for your donations to his opponent and then some..."

20
OregonAngel2 20 points ago +20 / -0

Almost 10 million dollars has been donated to push through Massie's opponent. The opponent won't even debate Massie and can barely read his lines. If that is the best the Zionist RINOs could come up with then that's pretty pathetic for a candidate.

Ask your self why all this just to eliminate one congressman? He's only one vote. He's only one voice....

...but he is the voice of the little boy in The Emperor's New Clothes.

That's why they have to silence him in the halls of Congress.

Also, this last minute bimbo attack reeks of Democrat tactics. Didn't they pull that on Trump? How ironic that Trump of all people pulls that on Massie.

Massie makes the point that Trump is serving Israel. Trump totally proves the point by his actions.

3
OregonAngel2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Erika took over after Charlie's assassination and gave the guy in charge of his security at the event a raise.

She not only didn't fire him. She gave him a raise.

She invited in people who Charlie was enemies with as soon as Charlie was gone.

There is a whole lot more, but I don't have time right now to list it.

1
OregonAngel2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tucker regretted supporting MAGA AFTER Trump did a whole lot of inexplicable things to hurt MAGA for the sake of Israel. You are taking events out of sequence. First Trump did things to hurt MAGA and then Tucker called him out on it.

We aren't obligated to support anyone or anything if it no longer follows our principles. Tucker stuck to his principles when it appeared Trump did not. I still have hope Trump has an explanation for some of the things he has done, but it has not been forthcoming yet.

view more: Next ›