Nuremberg code supersedes national law last I checked, adherence is irrelevant, it is a law that is put to governments not one they can choose to join, unless I'm wrong, need to see where it says I'm wrong
Incorrect. The U.S. is a signatory to the Code, which means (I expect) that it was ratified as a treaty. As such, it becomes part of the supreme law of the land, at par with the Constitution. (This is why some people attempt to re-write the Constitution by passing treaties, but changing the Constitution can only be done through amendment.)
Nuremberg code supersedes national law last I checked, adherence is irrelevant, it is a law that is put to governments not one they can choose to join, unless I'm wrong, need to see where it says I'm wrong
Incorrect. The U.S. is a signatory to the Code, which means (I expect) that it was ratified as a treaty. As such, it becomes part of the supreme law of the land, at par with the Constitution. (This is why some people attempt to re-write the Constitution by passing treaties, but changing the Constitution can only be done through amendment.)
Basically right conclusion, wrong premise from me i suppose