There has been some discussion stating that the number of shots produced and distributed around the world doesn't make much sense given the timeframe involved, and that these kill shots must have been stored and ready to go before the pandemic even began.
I think they did not have these vaccines produced and stored beforehand, or at least not nearly enough of them, because the plan was to release the virus later into what they thought would be HRC's second term. With Trump up for reelection and obviously going to win, they released the virus early and pushed hard for mail in voting. The early release meant this virus was likely more mild than intended, and the vaccine was not finished yet.
They didn't have time to produce the sheer volume of vaccines. They didn't even have time to perfect the timeframe of death after taking the shot. I'm still not sure if they wanted straight up death or just sterilization.
So now we see major differences in people's health reactions to the vaccines. Initial VAERS data showed approximately 5% of the shot lots caused 100% of the deaths. Now we have sites like howbad.info which clearly shows some lots causing massive amounts of injuries and deaths, while other lots have zero reported issues.
Operation Warpspeed turned the sub straight into the torpedo (Red October), except in this case, the pharmaceutical companies were able to cause some damage by producing a number of actually harmful vaccines, but not nearly as many as they would have liked to produce.
That's my current theory anyway. Hopefully we'll find out the truth soon enough.
If you start with the premise that SARS-Cov-2 has not been isolated, it leads to a vaccine that can't possibly target SARS-Cov-2. Accordingly, anything at all could have been rolled out once properly labeled.
But it was isolated. We came to this conclusion in one of the threads on here two weeks ago regarding the leaked Project Veritas documents from Major Murphys findings from the EcoHealth Alliance claiming that SARS-COV-2 was created as a bat vaccine initially. Lemme see if I can find the thread.
Don't bother. I am familiar with the argument and don't find it compelling. There are many efforts being made to keep the notions of viruses alive, but no human virus has ever been isolated, except if one changes the meaning of the word, which is SOP in virology.
https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/11/has-the-virus-been-isolated-no
How is it not compelling that gain of function research was done at the Wuhan lab to create a virus that could jump from bats to humans and that it was done on purpose to cull off the elderly and vulnerable, usher in an economic reset and a one world totalitarian government?
To claim that the virus never existed at all though and that it was just the flu killing people, flies in the face of everything Fauci did with Peter Dzasak regarding their funding of gain of function research despite the DOD saying it was too dangerous. Essentially you would be saying that Fauci did nothing wrong.
Good picture of the sequencing here
This is a computer composition. There is no reason to think that it It has any bases in reality. I spent a year of my PhD in Bioinformatics building sequences in computers based on segments mined from genome databases.