Saw this on 4chan -sorry if someone already posted - super relevant for this board
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (115)
sorted by:
Sorry having grown up in complemenarian churches where women submit and men lead, I can tell you this isn’t the solution to fixing marriages. It’s love. People have to live one another just like Jesus said. Without love the marriage you describe will be nothing but tyranny. Radical feminism simply reverses who gets to be the tyrant.
On that note, It never ceases to amaze me the people screaming 1776 whenever the government does something they don’t like, but those same people have a problem when a wife resists her tyrant husband and dares to expect love from him instead of a man-child barking overbearing orders and being irresponsible with money etc. Those wives are labeled a rebellious Jezebels. Very hypocritical if you ask me.
Ok. Let’s discuss. In generalities, of course. There will always be outliers.
God, Man, Woman, Child. That is the natural order. In my experience, any deviation from this ends in misery. Although, as you pointed out, mate selection is critical in choosing a partner capable of love.
Now, you what you’ve described as men aren’t men, they’re pussies. Or to put it more succinctly, they are men trying to play as women. Is that a dig at women? No. In the natural order, women are most secure, most happy, and most fulfilled when the male is the head of his family. So what does that mean? It means he puts God first and his wife and children above himself. He is the provider. This is part of what’s known as “the burden of male performance”. It’s the male who will sacrifice himself without a thought to protect his family. Not the other way around. Again, is that a dig at women? Not at all. A woman will do whatever she needs to do in order to protect her children, including killing if need be. But I digress, the point being whenever a man attempts to pass the burden of male performance onto his woman, pain and suffering will soon follow.
The tyrannical man in your example is simply an abusive asshole. Most likely due to never learning the natural order or how to truly care for a wife.
I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure love was in the equation. I see so many MRAs out there who want to play king of the castle but don’t realize that in Jesus’s kingdom the husband’s crown is a crown of thorns.
Well said! It’s a crown of thorns. Exactly. And any married man worth his salt will wear a crown of thorns with a smile on his face and joy in his heart knowing his wife and children are provided for. A woman can wear the crown if she chooses, but I’ve yet to meet one that finds any long-term joy in doing so. Raising children? Totally different story. In fact, I imagine an argument could potentially be made that motherhood is where the woman wears her own crown of thorns.
Oh I wish I’d had a dad like that. 😢. I saw other kids growing up who had such great dads and I felt so jealous. Glad to see your win family will be in good hands. 🙂