I am not trying to explain the significance of anything other than the implementation of a social credit system. I have said plenty on it already for it to make sense to you how it is being done, good boy points or general consensus based on similar. Information is not a Club, you do not decided who is eligible to provide information based off of shitty site metrics just like you wouldn't (shouldn't at least) blindly follow the Fauci model. It is called vested authority and it's repercussions plague us daily. That is Social Credit and following the model means that you are helping to implement it. Enough information has been given to suggest this behavior is willful.
I have been following both comment threads and you haven't shown the decode was anything but over your head. Melania knew back in 2012... as provided by handshake. When do you think this all started? While Hilary was running there was allusion to a 16 year plan, how long have the goodies known about that plan? Didn't it start with Obama? Wouldn't it had been planned before Obama?
Again, anybody who posts on .win sites will get their social credit scores lowered if the system is ever implemented, so your comments regarding it are simply a waste of time.
If handshake had posted something useful, I'd have replied in a different manner. I looked at the decode attempt, found it to be irrelevant, and stated as such, and you immediately jumped into defending the worthless comment.
For starters, the comment I replied to had nothing to do with Melania, so toss that line of logic out immediately.
Secondly, unless you have an explanation of how "I spy" links to Susan Rice joining the Board of Netflix, that decode is complete trash, period.
Handshake accounts are SOCIAL CREDIT TACTICS. Because Fauci held the position he held many listened to him and are now suffering. If someone's input is invalidated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT, if someone's input is validated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT! You haven't any need to fear your score because you are acting exactly as you should. Can we determine that any updoots are not the result of bots? Should we blindly determine the source of information invalid because the source hasn't enough updoots? See what I mean, yet?
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
You are conflating up and down votes on a message board and handshake status to tyrannical social credit systems. That's absurd. You are arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.
The simple up vs downvotes is used as a metric to see a relative measure of how agreeable your statement or comment is amongst the other users of this community.
It does not have an actual bearing on the resources allocated to you as a human being nor are you deprived of resources for a "low performance".
And handshake status is simply to demonstrate that a user is new. Which is mighty helpful when identifying shills, doomers or controlled opposition which are deliberate and real threats to the goals and harmony of these types of online communities. So again, this is nothing actual like a real life social credit system and to conflate it as such is completely disingenuous.
When getting into really cold or hot water, while best to just dive in completely, it is far more comfortable to slowly immerse yourself. While it takes longer to acclimate, the initial shock is far less severe.
I don't give a shit if somebody has a handshake or not. However, if they post garbage and also happen to be a handshake, I refer to them as "handshake."
And I didn't even downvote handshake or you in case you aren't shills and just retarded.
I don't care about upvotes, you big dummy.
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
If you want to point to Q Drops based on the time difference between the Obama Tweet and the @Fortbenning Tweet and treat it as a Delta, you absolutely need to show the link. Otherwise, your decode is complete garbage. But you knew that and you probably get paid per reply (or you're just really that retarded)...
wasn't the SR link # a MIRROR of another drop that was linked? I feel like handshake is probably an insider as I haven't seen many operate like them and they are spot on.
Your first comment to them was something like nice try handshake. COME ON!!!
If he had been way off the rails like some of these people that claim to see their name in the comms or something I could sympathize with you, but honestly you just seem hell bent on debunking decent digging. Because you cannot fathom the link doesn't mean that there isn't one. Nothing that handshake has posted would serve against Q and yet they are being attacked which started with comments about them being a handshake account.
Could it be as simple as both are about to hit mainstream and neither are really the same issue as the other?
Promises made, promises kept is all I see.
My issue is how easily they got everyone to play into the social credit system. As if it hadn't already been implemented years ago. Vested authority isn't new and that is essentially the pinnacle of social credit.
I am not trying to explain the significance of anything other than the implementation of a social credit system. I have said plenty on it already for it to make sense to you how it is being done, good boy points or general consensus based on similar. Information is not a Club, you do not decided who is eligible to provide information based off of shitty site metrics just like you wouldn't (shouldn't at least) blindly follow the Fauci model. It is called vested authority and it's repercussions plague us daily. That is Social Credit and following the model means that you are helping to implement it. Enough information has been given to suggest this behavior is willful.
I have been following both comment threads and you haven't shown the decode was anything but over your head. Melania knew back in 2012... as provided by handshake. When do you think this all started? While Hilary was running there was allusion to a 16 year plan, how long have the goodies known about that plan? Didn't it start with Obama? Wouldn't it had been planned before Obama?
Again, anybody who posts on .win sites will get their social credit scores lowered if the system is ever implemented, so your comments regarding it are simply a waste of time.
If handshake had posted something useful, I'd have replied in a different manner. I looked at the decode attempt, found it to be irrelevant, and stated as such, and you immediately jumped into defending the worthless comment.
For starters, the comment I replied to had nothing to do with Melania, so toss that line of logic out immediately.
Secondly, unless you have an explanation of how "I spy" links to Susan Rice joining the Board of Netflix, that decode is complete trash, period.
I can tell this is difficult for you.
Handshake accounts are SOCIAL CREDIT TACTICS. Because Fauci held the position he held many listened to him and are now suffering. If someone's input is invalidated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT, if someone's input is validated because of their status, that is SOCIAL CREDIT! You haven't any need to fear your score because you are acting exactly as you should. Can we determine that any updoots are not the result of bots? Should we blindly determine the source of information invalid because the source hasn't enough updoots? See what I mean, yet?
"I spy" doesn't have to link to Susan joining netflix, they were simultaneous infractions on the American Citizen, and the World Citizen conducted at the top levels of our "trusted" institutions.
You are conflating up and down votes on a message board and handshake status to tyrannical social credit systems. That's absurd. You are arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.
The simple up vs downvotes is used as a metric to see a relative measure of how agreeable your statement or comment is amongst the other users of this community.
It does not have an actual bearing on the resources allocated to you as a human being nor are you deprived of resources for a "low performance".
And handshake status is simply to demonstrate that a user is new. Which is mighty helpful when identifying shills, doomers or controlled opposition which are deliberate and real threats to the goals and harmony of these types of online communities. So again, this is nothing actual like a real life social credit system and to conflate it as such is completely disingenuous.
When getting into really cold or hot water, while best to just dive in completely, it is far more comfortable to slowly immerse yourself. While it takes longer to acclimate, the initial shock is far less severe.
Just a taste, but it's cut from the same cake.
It's pretty simple for me and difficult for you.
I don't give a shit if somebody has a handshake or not. However, if they post garbage and also happen to be a handshake, I refer to them as "handshake."
And I didn't even downvote handshake or you in case you aren't shills and just retarded.
I don't care about upvotes, you big dummy.
If you want to point to Q Drops based on the time difference between the Obama Tweet and the @Fortbenning Tweet and treat it as a Delta, you absolutely need to show the link. Otherwise, your decode is complete garbage. But you knew that and you probably get paid per reply (or you're just really that retarded)...
Pretty sure that link was "i spy"
lol
WHAT?
wasn't the SR link # a MIRROR of another drop that was linked? I feel like handshake is probably an insider as I haven't seen many operate like them and they are spot on.
Your first comment to them was something like nice try handshake. COME ON!!!
If he had been way off the rails like some of these people that claim to see their name in the comms or something I could sympathize with you, but honestly you just seem hell bent on debunking decent digging. Because you cannot fathom the link doesn't mean that there isn't one. Nothing that handshake has posted would serve against Q and yet they are being attacked which started with comments about them being a handshake account.
Could it be as simple as both are about to hit mainstream and neither are really the same issue as the other?
Promises made, promises kept is all I see.
My issue is how easily they got everyone to play into the social credit system. As if it hadn't already been implemented years ago. Vested authority isn't new and that is essentially the pinnacle of social credit.