"Yawn" is not a rebuttal, but a training of The Matrix. You ignore the evidence if it doesn't support your belief (or in this case, a statement that would lead to evidence if you looked). Reaffirmation of Bias is not the path to the Truth, but the path back into the control of The Matrix.
“Yawn” is a response to the same old, worn-out, regurgitated lies (evidence [sic] ) people gleefully tell each other. After decades and decades of trying to enlighten the willfully-ignorant, I’ve learned you don’t want the truth, but rather choose to wade in your own self-serving calumny. Deo vindice.
I have spent my entire life in search of the Truth. I care nothing about what final form that Truth takes. I care only that I pursue it in earnest; which means I look at all the evidence. In that pursuit I follow the evidence, not any desires I may have, since my only desire is to understand the Truth.
The evidence suggests that what I stated is the best theory to fit all the facts. I can list the evidence all day long if you wish to engage, but it requires you actually look at it. If you think I haven't spent any time studying the Bible; I spent two decades studying it and arguing with biblical scholars and theologians. I'm you're Huckleberry.
If you wish to see the beginning of the evidence chain I can submit please see the link in my response to another person in this same thread.
Do you study the bible, or Luther’s version, chopped and mis-translated to fit his new theology, this theology that no one taught and no one believed prior to the 1500s? If you want to discuss the Douay Rheims, I’d consider. Otherwise it’s like debating the repairing of a Ford engine with a Mitsubishi Chilton.
Yawn
"Yawn" is not a rebuttal, but a training of The Matrix. You ignore the evidence if it doesn't support your belief (or in this case, a statement that would lead to evidence if you looked). Reaffirmation of Bias is not the path to the Truth, but the path back into the control of The Matrix.
“Yawn” is a response to the same old, worn-out, regurgitated lies (evidence [sic] ) people gleefully tell each other. After decades and decades of trying to enlighten the willfully-ignorant, I’ve learned you don’t want the truth, but rather choose to wade in your own self-serving calumny. Deo vindice.
I have spent my entire life in search of the Truth. I care nothing about what final form that Truth takes. I care only that I pursue it in earnest; which means I look at all the evidence. In that pursuit I follow the evidence, not any desires I may have, since my only desire is to understand the Truth.
The evidence suggests that what I stated is the best theory to fit all the facts. I can list the evidence all day long if you wish to engage, but it requires you actually look at it. If you think I haven't spent any time studying the Bible; I spent two decades studying it and arguing with biblical scholars and theologians. I'm you're Huckleberry.
If you wish to see the beginning of the evidence chain I can submit please see the link in my response to another person in this same thread.
Do you study the bible, or Luther’s version, chopped and mis-translated to fit his new theology, this theology that no one taught and no one believed prior to the 1500s? If you want to discuss the Douay Rheims, I’d consider. Otherwise it’s like debating the repairing of a Ford engine with a Mitsubishi Chilton.