I presented evidence, and you haven't addressed a single piece of it. If it is false, then it is easy to present counter arguments.
I'm willing to bet you haven't even looked at it.
Let's try something really simple. I showed the codex of Theodosianus. I don't know anyone who disputes its existence. It codifies into law the Trinity (as defined 60 years after the Nicene convention), as well as all the other beliefs of the Catholic Church (and all other "Christian Religions" as they are known today).
How do you rectify that given that it was codified 400 years after the time attributed to Jesus, and was originally defined by the convention created by the self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God (Constantine) to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire under his DIVINE rule. That also has no reasonable dispute I have ever seen.
I presented evidence, and you haven't addressed a single piece of it. If it is false, then it is easy to present counter arguments.
I'm willing to bet you haven't even looked at it.
Let's try something really simple. I showed the codex of Theodosianus. I don't know anyone who disputes its existence. It codifies into law the Trinity (as defined 60 years after the Nicene convention), as well as all the other beliefs of the Catholic Church (and all other "Christian Religions" as they are known today).
How do you rectify that given that it was codified 400 years after the time attributed to Jesus, and was originally defined by the convention created by the self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God (Constantine) to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire under his DIVINE rule. That also has no reasonable dispute I have ever seen.
How do you rectify those things?