For the "Cop Hater" fan bois...
Educate yourselves!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
LOVELY!!!!
This isn't to detract, some things must be changed. To protect and serve, removed from everything that the state possesses. It is clearly a lie that we can agree exists.
The definitions in the amendments made to sound as though corporations are people thus people are corporations need to be made clear that this is not the case, a living human being is separate from a brick and mortar building, buildings have no rights. Fancy wording was used to confuse. Police are to no longer be paid by their municipality but by the state directly, their must be a division allotted to officers that would ensure they have no reason to cover anything up for their municipality. Live body cams from clock in to clock out, everyone in the department. Procedures should be implemented to ensure that case work/sensitive information isn't revealed of course.
Constitutional law, as written for the people needs to be taught. Government was not created to dictate the daily lives of man. I am leaning heavily on drivers licenses as they are wholly unconstitutional and "Law Enforcement" is all to happy to comply.
If your job has you swear an oath it would behoove you to know what you are swearing to. As it stands, almost all in law enforcement are guilty of not upholding their oath. Thinking it meant something and acting on it vs knowing what it meant and acting within law are two very different things. They are complicit with operating with the State an illegal money grab. If they are not here to protect us then why would they bother me about a seat belt or speed or license? I agree that seat belts and speed limits are not the end of the world. But imposing a fee to "freely travel" then imposing a fee if i do not carry documentation when I "freely travel". An obligation clearly prohibited by the document they are meant to uphold. Asset forfeiture was fun too.
That "serve and protect" nonsense generated by California liberals. That was nothing more than a radio contest by the Los Angeles Police Department in the 1950's for a slogan for them. It is nothing more than a LIBERAL attempt to try to exert control over law enforcement. It's bull shyt. Go ahead and google it.
Law enforcement officers LOVE the body/dash cams because they are the most prominent factor is thousands of law enforcement officers being found innocent and exonerated regarding thousands of complaints that would have otherwise been upheld just to appease the masses. The officers now have all the proof they need to show that the majority of complaints are LIES.
Again, you are proliferating a LIE. The truth is that the majority in law enforcement ARE Oath Keepers and "cop haters" like you can never provide any reliable source for the case being otherwise. So PROVE it! I'll wait.
No one has ever denied you your right to "freely travel". You're free to take the shoe leather express anywhere you want, even across state lines or country borders.
Where your argument fails is your contention that operating a motor vehicle on a taxpayer funded street or highway is a "right". IT IS NOT. It is a privilege and if you want to exercise that PRIVILEGE then you have to meet the requirements.
Of course, if you don't like the way that this nation is operated, then you are quite free to shoe leather express your ass to a country that is more to your liking. Good luck with that,...sovereign citizen wannabe.
My freedoms are not to be infringed and are never to be given through obligation. Freedom of travel. If I am not employed through interstate commerce I am not obligated and cannot be to hold a license or insurance. That is really all that needs to be said about it, I think. Municipalities are using police to enforce unconstitutional laws.
Asset forfeiture is another, as I am free to own property and it cannot simply be taken because. Again, municipalities using police to enforce unconstitutional law.
That is called treason, pretty sure. I do not hate cops, I hate what they do without knowing.
code and statute enforcement would also fall under enforcing unconstitutional law, because it isn't law.
What in the world does ANY of this have to do with "Qualified Immunity"?
Why yes, we ARE aware of your Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist tactics.
You failingly tried to utilize #4 because you couldn't refute the original topic of qualified immunity.
Get back on topic. Or are you going to simply resort to something else on the ole Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist?
Actually you failed to answer my question about qualified immunity. Why are citizens not allowed that luxury? Classifying law enforcement as citizens doesn't answer the question. It is not afforded to the average citizen, you must join the club to get it, you see what I mean? They are civil servants, I cannot fathom why they would require more protection than the citizens they don't have to protect.
And seeing the State of the Republic lends to the notion that they are seriously not doing as they should be.
What a neat list!
I do not recall changing the narrative one bit, I suggested changes in the structure based off the information that you provided me and information that I provided you. Do let me know if I check another box without knowing, I can be quite absent minded.
I think that you are guilty of number 4 and 5 right now, maybe 2
ummm... ism!!!
Am i doing it right?