For the "Cop Hater" fan bois...
Educate yourselves!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
My freedoms are not to be infringed and are never to be given through obligation. Freedom of travel. If I am not employed through interstate commerce I am not obligated and cannot be to hold a license or insurance. That is really all that needs to be said about it, I think. Municipalities are using police to enforce unconstitutional laws.
Asset forfeiture is another, as I am free to own property and it cannot simply be taken because. Again, municipalities using police to enforce unconstitutional law.
That is called treason, pretty sure. I do not hate cops, I hate what they do without knowing.
code and statute enforcement would also fall under enforcing unconstitutional law, because it isn't law.
What in the world does ANY of this have to do with "Qualified Immunity"?
Why yes, we ARE aware of your Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist tactics.
You failingly tried to utilize #4 because you couldn't refute the original topic of qualified immunity.
Get back on topic. Or are you going to simply resort to something else on the ole Liberal Left Wing(nut) Arguing Checklist?
Actually you failed to answer my question about qualified immunity. Why are citizens not allowed that luxury? Classifying law enforcement as citizens doesn't answer the question. It is not afforded to the average citizen, you must join the club to get it, you see what I mean? They are civil servants, I cannot fathom why they would require more protection than the citizens they don't have to protect.
And seeing the State of the Republic lends to the notion that they are seriously not doing as they should be.
It certainly does. Qualified immunity applies to ALL GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC OFFICIALS. Not just law enforcement. It applies to judges, Clerk of Court secretaries, federal, state, county, and city attorneys and their staff, city garbage collectors, city and county fire, building and other inspectors, ANYBODY who works for a governmental entity. Are they all not citizens? Do you even think?
Which clearly shows why you would never have ever been considered for a position on the Supreme Court. You simply don't get to place law enforcement officers in a "Damned if you do AND damned if you don't." situation. And it's not more protection, it's sufficiently minimum appropriate protection.
AGAIN: “A policeman’s lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he has probable cause, and being mulcted in damages if he does,” ~ Chief Justice Earl Warren
I'll reword the question: why are normal citizens not holding a seat under government not allowed the same luxury? If you cannot see how having a set of citizens with more freedoms than another is a problem I do not know if you are aware of what the United States actually is. This does not fly in a republic which is why I suggested the changes that I did and why I am as adamant as I am. The operation is illegal at large. The fact that it exists as it does today is testimony that they do not do as they are said to do. Government officials shouldn't be allowed a position that they can make mistakes without due burden but the average citizen cannot. That is kind of like a monarchy.
Doesn't matter though. It is being rectified.
I will leave you with this again.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
My freedoms and rights as a citizen are clearly laid out. All the fancy wording in the world cannot hide them. Obligations levied against my Freedoms and Rights are unconstitutional, tyrannical if you would. Treason.
Just because it started long ago doesn't give anyone a pass that is partaking today.
What a neat list!
I do not recall changing the narrative one bit, I suggested changes in the structure based off the information that you provided me and information that I provided you. Do let me know if I check another box without knowing, I can be quite absent minded.
I think that you are guilty of number 4 and 5 right now, maybe 2
ummm... ism!!!
Am i doing it right?
Why no, you are not. But then I suspect that's a result of your common core liberal educa,... errr,....indoctrination.
And we are all still waiting for your proof of all those arrests for not wearing masks that YOU state exist. I, and all the other readers, have noticed that you seem to be avoiding producing the proof to support your assertion. Or, are you ready to admit that such arrests for not wearing a mask DON'T EXIST?
I never asserted that anyone was getting into trouble for not wearing masks by the police. That was someone else. Who is changing the goal posts now, or is this forum sliding? It is so hard to keep up with all the hip, cool, lingo!
That is actually down right slander, I think, asserting that I had done something that I haven't. I am going to be honest, I do not know.
Here is some of that sweet illegal enforcement though; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1uDbObybso
I think it is kind of obvious who is who in this conversation.
Have a good day!
Also, while I have you, why are some Citizens treated to special circumstances under Law and others are not? I am going to find a way to ask this question that you will answer!
Cheap shot, I know but I cannot resist!
Calls me liberally indoctrinated
Doesn't know what a Republic is