Uh Oh: Democrats Didn’t Realize This Was Embedded in Maricopa County Ballots
(www.americanlibertyemail.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
A more official source than the only legally permitted manufacturer of the ballots?
I think you need to pesonally dig deeper, if that is what you're concluding.
The source of this is americanlibertyemail.com claiming that the ballot manufacturer said this. Do we have direct word from the ballot manufacturer that is not passed through a third party?
I saw the entire interview of the CEO of the ballot manufacturing company.
Why haven't you?
I missed that one! Can you share a link?
I'm not digging for a link for you.
do it yourself
OK, that’s great, but that’s not included in the article. Again, do you not understand the priority of sourcing if you’re trying to convince somebody of something? Nothing in the article states that you watched that video. There are no sources for any of the claims made in this article. Claims, by the way, that I believe are true! But you’re not gonna convince someone with a very poorly or completely unsourced article just because you watched a video that they may or may not have seen.
You are wasting your time. He is a self righteous prick that would rather call people concern trolls than be even a little helpful. They can’t find it, can’t remember any actual details to help others find it, or just plain made it up to support his earlier comment and not seem like a complete idiot spreading unsubstantiated “facts”.
Nobody has seen it for months, if it was this one. There was a Rumble video "Bob Hughes Maricopa County Ballot Printer Talks About AZ Audit," but It's been removed from this link: https://wethepundit.com/maricopa-county-arizona-ballot-printer-talks-facts/
and this one
https://skagitrepublicans.com/BobHughesMaricopaBallotPrinterTalksAboutArizonaAuditTheDeepRigQA
and also YT:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/SuzanneMaresca/maricopa-ballot-printer-talks-about-arizona-audit
(has anyone ever heard of these blogs before?)
which you can see were published in June 2021, before the audit was over, so he couldn't have been spilling the beans then. He might have been the one who was describing how many kinds of ballots each election requires, though. That was a good interview if someone can find it. I do feel there must have been a print version, since I seldom watch videos. In just this one county there may be over 600 variations, as each school and judicial and tax district will have a unique set of candidates and proposals, so it is a huge coordination problem.
Found a print report finally.
https://uniteamericafirst.com/maricopa-county-auditor-bob-hughes-shares-how-they-use-high-tech-equipment-to-verify-validity-of-ballots/
So if he was on the audit team, he was talking out of turn on July 26 to be revealing this.
Except that legally permitted printer of ballots didn’t write the article, did they? Someone wrote this article, and I believe the contents of the article are true, but I don’t know the guy. He can be lying.
He technically could be flat out making up everything in the article. That’s why you need receipts. Again, I believe the guy, I really do, but no one should just take his word for it and Normies won’t.
I sense some confusion here. Runbeck is an official printer of ballots: are they the official printer? Because there were apparently printing machines at some locations, according to a blurb from the County Recorders office. Furthermore, there is this Bob Hughes guy. He was in a video that was all over the place but is now mostly memory holed except for all the links I already posted in this thread, and several times was described as "Maricopa ballot printer." Not sure if he's a CEO of anything. Who are you talking about?
He means he wants CNN and MSNBC to report it so all those who STILL think these are legitimate news outlets will believe it.
That is not what I mean at all, but thanks for trying.
If CNN or MSNBC reported it, I would know with certainty it was fake.
I gave something of an exaggeration. I had the feeling you knew those were beyond help, but I don't know what you might think is a better source. The people who really need to read and hear this stuff don't pay attention to any of these alternative media sources. They are either getting MSM feeds via Yahoo, Google, or MSN, or playing video games using weird apha-numeric screen names.
The faggots who bitch about sources on KNOWN INFORMATION are hilarious.
They don't know what is going on, will not seek to confirm information, but assume they are some kind of authority.
It really is a joke.
It is clearly not known information. This article is the first time many in this thread are hearing about this confirmation of a radioisotope in the ballots. Stop complaining and give me something to go off of in finding that source.
fuck off
And just because you know it doesn’t mean some Normie we’re going to try to show this to already knows it. I’m struggling as to why you’re simply refusing to grasp that. You’re a smart guy. You know sources are important. You’re just pretending not to get it. Don’t be so defensive. Everyone around here is so damned defensive all the time.
You just don’t like that someone pointed out that the article is poorly sourced. You just don’t like it. So you’re lashing out. It’s childish. Stop.
Yes. Though I actually get their concern. They want those still with their fingers in their ears screaming "there was no fraud" over and over to finally be convinced of the truth that even a casual glance would reveal about election fraud. When measures are taken to correct and mitigate this fraud, these people are going to go dangerously bonkers. The concerned want as few of these people left as possible when this happens.