I'm on a different computer, I'm normally here as okaygroomer and racialmaddow. We've chatted before.
It seems like there was some kind of plan in place to wake the population up from their communist-driven slumber. It's all too perfectly orchestrated and crumbling down in a nice linear fashion. I'm comfy. My friends in the military have no idea about Q or election fraud, even the ones who are intelligence collectors and satellite/internet "make internet appear out of the sky in the middle of nowhere" engineers. Or they're lying to me about what they know but I never push for information. Hope I answered your question okay.
Oh yeah - I know your alts. I get cagey responses from the friends I have who are still active, especially the Space Force ones. Do they really know? I don't think so. I believe the Q plan is being executed at such a high and compartmentalized level that very few people have the picture - Q intimated as such.
I moved from DC very recently, so I don't see all my MIL/IC friends on a weekly basis like I used to. So my 2 streams are drying up.
As a former analyst, I've been tracking Q since day 01 of the post. Of course, the first 10 or 20 posts I looked at with a very skeptical eye. As I watched more and more posts come out, I quickly started seeing the bigger picture - that who/what was Q was some form of information operation. That theory has withstood the test of time. It's really been an iterative process, analyzing the drops, but then going back in time to see how they have been proven true.
I have no doubt Q is the real thing - a multi-faceted operation designed wake the most committed to the fight (anons); poke the Deep State into making mistakes; communicating with active operators; and creating a body of work - which no entity has been able to thwart - which can be referenced as we move along the timeline, continually proving statements to the public.
Maybe one day, I hope, I will be able to teach a college course on Q. Of course that means I'd have to get a PhD - not sure if I have that much energy left. But who knows - if you ever see a college offer "Analyzing Q" as a course, it just may be me teaching it.
Fun times. As a handshake lemme ask you this - since you have MI experience, what do you see w Q?
I'm on a different computer, I'm normally here as okaygroomer and racialmaddow. We've chatted before.
It seems like there was some kind of plan in place to wake the population up from their communist-driven slumber. It's all too perfectly orchestrated and crumbling down in a nice linear fashion. I'm comfy. My friends in the military have no idea about Q or election fraud, even the ones who are intelligence collectors and satellite/internet "make internet appear out of the sky in the middle of nowhere" engineers. Or they're lying to me about what they know but I never push for information. Hope I answered your question okay.
Oh yeah - I know your alts. I get cagey responses from the friends I have who are still active, especially the Space Force ones. Do they really know? I don't think so. I believe the Q plan is being executed at such a high and compartmentalized level that very few people have the picture - Q intimated as such.
I moved from DC very recently, so I don't see all my MIL/IC friends on a weekly basis like I used to. So my 2 streams are drying up.
As a former analyst, I've been tracking Q since day 01 of the post. Of course, the first 10 or 20 posts I looked at with a very skeptical eye. As I watched more and more posts come out, I quickly started seeing the bigger picture - that who/what was Q was some form of information operation. That theory has withstood the test of time. It's really been an iterative process, analyzing the drops, but then going back in time to see how they have been proven true.
I have no doubt Q is the real thing - a multi-faceted operation designed wake the most committed to the fight (anons); poke the Deep State into making mistakes; communicating with active operators; and creating a body of work - which no entity has been able to thwart - which can be referenced as we move along the timeline, continually proving statements to the public.
Maybe one day, I hope, I will be able to teach a college course on Q. Of course that means I'd have to get a PhD - not sure if I have that much energy left. But who knows - if you ever see a college offer "Analyzing Q" as a course, it just may be me teaching it.