Ah, okay I understand what you mean. Yes, as this technology keeps maturing, there will be revolutions in terms of underlying technologies on the Internet. Perhaps in future data-centers will be replaced by peer2peer distributed storage (it will probably take an innovation beyond a block chain for this to work) and I sure hope the concept of "cloud computing" - people storing their data on some Bit Tech computer will come to an end.
None of this is as revolutionary as when the same Elites allowed the Internet to enter the public realm for the first time. Our history has been littered with revolutionary communication technology - each one starting off with freedom for people, but always successfully subverted by the Elites. The reason for this is complex because the Elites are not a monolithic entity and they always plan on long term.
They always let technology grow however it does, but curb whatever developments they don't like. For instance, remember all those forums and chats in the early days of internet where small communities were thriving. FBI had infiltrated almost every one of those forums, and by disruption, and by enticing people to move to Big Tech (like discord, reddit etc) they pretty much destroyed those.
I am sure they plan to d the same with whatever new tech comes out of it. However, this time they were also expecting the complete enslavement to happen long before that - 2024 would have been the end of 2nd term under Killary and it would have all been over.
They could’ve gone from digital fiat --> CBDC
Digital fiat took a long time to get people used to, esp outside US. Up until Covid time, at the supermarket checkouts I would always see long lines in front of the cash counters. Jumping to CDBC requires couple of things. Absolute trust. Thats one reason. A lot of people don't even realise that CDBC is centralised. A lot of them will believe that whatever the CDBC that will be pushed forward "is like bitcoin".
Then there is also the timing. Bitcoin came out right after 2008 GFC and when people were waking up against Big Banks. This was exactly like the period between 1890s and 1913 when people were getting really angry with the banks, and they introduced Federal Reserve System as an entity to subdue the banks.
Having said all that, I wont rule out that Satoshi was an Anon. Its possible he released his paper purely on his own and developed Bitcoin on his own, but eventually deep state figured out how to use it to their advantage. However the more I think about the origins, the less I feel its likely.
Ah, okay I understand what you mean. Yes, as this technology keeps maturing, there will be revolutions in terms of underlying technologies on the Internet. Perhaps in future data-centers will be replaced by peer2peer distributed storage (it will probably take an innovation beyond a block chain for this to work) and I sure hope the concept of "cloud computing" - people storing their data on some Bit Tech computer will come to an end.
None of this is as revolutionary as when the same Elites allowed the Internet to enter the public realm for the first time. Our history has been littered with revolutionary communication technology - each one starting off with freedom for people, but always successfully subverted by the Elites. The reason for this is complex because the Elites are not a monolithic entity and they always plan on long term.
They always let technology grow however it does, but curb whatever developments they don't like. For instance, remember all those forums and chats in the early days of internet where small communities were thriving. FBI had infiltrated almost every one of those forums, and by disruption, and by enticing people to move to Big Tech (like discord, reddit etc) they pretty much destroyed those.
I am sure they plan to d the same with whatever new tech comes out of it. However, this time they were also expecting the complete enslavement to happen long before that - 2024 would have been the end of 2nd term under Killary and it would have all been over.
Digital fiat took a long time to get people used to, esp outside US. Up until Covid time, at the supermarket checkouts I would always see long lines in front of the cash counters. Jumping to CDBC requires couple of things. Absolute trust. Thats one reason. A lot of people don't even realise that CDBC is centralised. A lot of them will believe that whatever the CDBC that will be pushed forward "is like bitcoin".
Then there is also the timing. Bitcoin came out right after 2008 GFC and when people were waking up against Big Banks. This was exactly like the period between 1890s and 1913 when people were getting really angry with the banks, and they introduced Federal Reserve System as an entity to subdue the banks.
Having said all that, I wont rule out that Satoshi was an Anon. Its possible he released his paper purely on his own and developed Bitcoin on his own, but eventually deep state figured out how to use it to their advantage. However the more I think about the origins, the less I feel its likely.