It was an awesome concert! I have been spoiled as I don’t go to many concerts but my little list includes the Thriller concert, Billy Joel (twice), U2, Elton John (Farewell tour), Alan Jackson, and Trans-Siberian Orchestra.

Our daughter bought us the TSO tickets in 2019 thinking I liked the group when in fact I like Mannheim Steamroller, thanks to Rush. It turned out to be an amazing concert! I shudder now about all of this music (especially Bono and U2) knowing what I know, but at least they didn’t get a lot of money from me.

I was there 85-92. You probably had some of my friends as your nurses! 😁 We were married there so our marriage certificate says AFB.

It was still an AFB at the time so I dunno about changing it. Makes me realize that a lot of documents refer to bases that no longer exist!

Agreed :D hopefully the reveal comes at the perfect time.

This entire narrative you're peddling is MSM garbage. None of the people you listed had the Media, lawyers, and all the other clowns pushing them as pedophiles. Arguing this narrative is like trying to argue that COVID is dangerous to children. It's simply fabricated nonsense by the powers that be to destroy anything good. The supporting evidence is just as (in)valid too.

And the people you listed have actual evidence against them (leaked emails, Epstein flight logs, etc.(no concrete proof admittedly, but much more than anything on Jackson.)) instead of a photo that you deem "not normal" which is quite literally just a picture of the dude. Jackson on the other hand has a bunch of phony accusers who either have a known vendetta against him or who came out and said they fabricated their story at the request of their parents, among a bunch of other nonsense that piles on more and more reason to believe it was simply a hitjob. And unlike Jackson, there aren't really any good arguments or proof that counter the pedo claims for the people you mentioned. Meanwhile, Jackson is replete with that kind of counter-evidence.

You have lawyers who make up disingenuous nonsense like "the boys would sleep in Jackson's room" which makes it sound like they sleep together. They didn't say he sleeps with the boys though, they carefully worded it like that since his room is the size of a duplex so sleeping in his room is not the same as sleeping with him in his bed.

And what "Los Angeles Superior Court Judge" would ever try an actual pedophile? I acknowledged in my post that the courts are corrupt and him not being convicted doesn't mean he's innocent necessarily. On the other hand, you seem to be full steam ahead with using corrupt court clown shows as some kind of evidence that he's guilty based on what was presented. In reality, just like the corrupt courts could be covering for him, they could also be conducting a hitjob against him. Make him a scapegoat and hide the real pedos. Also, none of the people on your list would ever be tried in a court with the cabal still in power. They would never be defamed by the corrupt media. They would never get a hit-piece documentary made against them. Jackson, however, got the "full treatment". Similar to the Trump witch hunt, actually. Very similar. Almost identical, in fact.

And shit, even Trump says he doesn't think Jackson was a pedophile. He let his own kids spend time alone with him as well. Don Jr says the same; Jackson is not a pedophile. If I'm picking who to listen to between the corrupt MSM, lawyers, and other clowns or actual trustworthy people, I think I know who I'm going with (one of the comments from the video below says it perfectly: "The most compelling argument for his innocence is the fact that the media said he was guilty.").

The settlement is laughable. It's one of the worse pieces of "evidence" out there (explained more in detail in the video linked below). And, of course, it's presented in a biased way and supplemented with some quote by someone who clearly dislikes the guy. Which seems to be a theme here. Seriously, a lot of this just reads like anti-Jackson propaganda as opposed to a fair and unbiased presentation of the facts. So much stuff unrelated to the pedophile claim that seems to only exist to defame him and make him easier to vilify. Typical MSM tactic to demonize and dehumanize people that go against their narrative, like Trump. Also, kind of funny that the maid is bitching about him being unsanitary. "Ughhh this guy is so unclean and never appreciates all the work I put in! Wait... what's this? People are accusing him of being a pedophile? YEA GUYS THAT'S RIGHT FUCK THIS GUY!!!"

McManus is a clown who, like many in this Jackson hitjob, goes to the corrupt media (again, this whole narrative is MSM backed. Since when is that where we get truthful information from?) instead of the police (what has this behavior told us in the past?). Like a #MeToo fag or a "Trump is a rapist" moron. Found this little write-up on her which pretty much sums it up:

"Adrian McManus went on 60 minutes and claimed she saw little boys underwear laying around that were 'crusty'. Vomit.

This is the same Adrian McManus who was fired for theft. The same Adrian McManus who was still trying to profit off of Michael after he died, selling bags of what she claims were chunks of Michael's hair from the shower on eBay. The same Adrian McManus who admitted she was in contact with Victor Gutierrez. The same Adrian McManus who claims her life was threatened if she testified against Michael, but had no problem selling stories to the tabloids while she supposedly feared for her life.

She is the primary source of this story."

Another good point I saw someone mention:

"These accusers have wildly conflicting stories. Some accusers say michael had alarms fitted to doors because he was so paranoid about getting caught and he would know in advance if someone was entering the room, other accusers say he was careless leaving crusty underwear lying about and fucking children in wide open spaces."

And all these little anecdotes mean absolutely nothing. Proving he had problems or was weird does not make him a pedophile. It just makes you look biased against him that you'd use that as a way to call him one. But let's use some logic on this. Vaseline everywhere? Why? Did he fuck kids in every part of Neverland? When people were around? Or would he have done that hidden away from prying eyes? Why put the stuff everywhere if he only used it to fuck kids in certain places? Then there are all the actual uses for Vaseline which, if he used it frequently, would explain why he had it everywhere. Checking into drug rehab does not equal pedophile, not much else to say on that one. Being falsely accused of being a pedophile while also potentially having a certain knowledge of the cabal due to his position is a pretty fucking good reason to leave the country when you don't know what their plan is. "Crunchy underwear" frankly just sounds made up. Like all the "porn" they found which amounted to one big nothing-burger.

So maybe you aren't interested in evidence and would rather just accuse anyone and everyone of being a pedo who does any little thing you think is weird or "not normal", but most people here are interested in evidence. This is why they continue to bring up the people you listed as being pedophiles while pointing out that Jackson almost assuredly wasn't one.

If you are actually interested in evidence, and assuming you haven't seen it before, then this series of videos presents some good arguments (just a warning if you watch, dude gets a bit high energy at times. Info is still good though if you can get through it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pnoQqlygQs&list=PLmirOw7JCi826i_J_xsWhtY7jh2sqIlpX&index=1