Wait, what? EU watchdog accuses Ursula von der Leyen of "maladministration" and orders her to hand over secret texts she sent to #Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla.
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
🚔 Crime & Corruption 💸
whats the read on dailymail...sometimes i read it and it has some very truthy articles and sometimes its uber lib...and sometimes its like a gossip rag.....
▼ I posted this a couple of days ago.
Positives: Daily Mail is possibly the most viewed western news source on a daily basis. Historically right of centre. Paper version read by highest amount of educated and retired in the U.K. Stories tend to be fair but with some sensationalism. Neutral on Trump sometimes the story seems pro the MAGA agenda sometimes against. They keep the comments section open and don’t moderate too much.It’s often the best gauge of true public opinion and can be more entertaining than the story. They seem to recognise that they are pitching at U.K., US, Can , Aus and NZ simultaneously and as such need to be politically closer to the US right than it’s British origins. They have a journalist called Peter Hitchin who to his credit was a lone voice in trying to flag up the bogus scamdemic for over 2 years. He really tried to wake people up and wouldn’t be silenced. Negatives: It’s origins are pure establishment . Long time editor in chief Geordie Grieg is well connected and has been pictured many times with Ghislaine Maxwell. I’d use it as a news source over the BBC or Guardian. Telegraph and Times are paywalled
🐸🐸
thanks
I read it because they always have the best photos. Then I read the comments for the truthiness.
right? they have SOOO many photos...sometimes I dont even read the article and just look through the pics..theres a lot of juicy stuff
I go straight to Best Comments, then Worst Comments. Kek.
Kek great idea
I think it's mostly comms. It's crazy sometimes, isn't it?
8 ball says yes