Say it with me folks. It is unethical to test a drug with unknown effects on a pregnant woman and her unborn child. We don't do that, except in cases where the disease itself is a disease of pregnancy, and then only after extensive animal testing. We get the data from surveillance of women who end up using the drug of their own choice who happen to become pregnant along the way. Hell, prior to 1990, we didn't test on women at all. All medical testing was done on men because we're the disposable sex, and women were to be protected, pregnant or not because so many women become pregnant without planning to be.
If you look at just about every drug approved in the last 5-10 years you will see that exact same statement in the FDA label. Only older drugs, for which we do have reliable long-term surveillance data will you see a more thorough statement, because by then we'll have accumulated enough surveillance data.
If you want to show conspiracy, find the documents that show Moderna knew there was a risk and then reported this "we don't know" statement anyway. Pfizer has such documents that recently got FOIA'd. Comirnaty's label still claims no ill effects despite their clear, internal data showing otherwise. Better yet, get that now-public DOD vaccine side effect data and send it to FDA demanding they update the labels of both mRNA vaccines.
It's one thing to make wild accusations. It's another thing entirely to actually be able to prove someone knowingly lied for profit.
Say it with me folks. It is unethical to test a drug with unknown effects on a pregnant woman and her unborn child. We don't do that, except in cases where the disease itself is a disease of pregnancy, and then only after extensive animal testing. We get the data from surveillance of women who end up using the drug of their own choice who happen to become pregnant along the way. Hell, prior to 1990, we didn't test on women at all. All medical testing was done on men because we're the disposable sex, and women were to be protected, pregnant or not because so many women become pregnant without planning to be.
If you look at just about every drug approved in the last 5-10 years you will see that exact same statement in the FDA label. Only older drugs, for which we do have reliable long-term surveillance data will you see a more thorough statement, because by then we'll have accumulated enough surveillance data.
If you want to show conspiracy, find the documents that show Moderna knew there was a risk and then reported this "we don't know" statement anyway. Pfizer has such documents that recently got FOIA'd. Comirnaty's label still claims no ill effects despite their clear, internal data showing otherwise. Better yet, get that now-public DOD vaccine side effect data and send it to FDA demanding they update the labels of both mRNA vaccines.
It's one thing to make wild accusations. It's another thing entirely to actually be able to prove someone knowingly lied for profit.