I passed a car on the road last week with a bumper sticker that made me chuckle. It read: “Critical thinking — the other national deficit.” I’ve been thinking about that bumper sticker a lot lately — ever since my essay “What is Luciferase” (exclusively on Substack) set off a firestorm. The corporate media issued the same blanket denial with the same regurgitated sentences (a cut and paste journalism job if ever there was one!) seemingly around the world: there’s no such ingredient secretly hiding inside the experimental vaccines!
Did any of these so-called journalists do the homework? Did any of them actually perform a fact-check? Of course they didn’t. Most of them didn’t even read the essay. (Let’s be honest: most of them don’t read anything at all.) I had left the instructions for fact-checking my claim right there for everyone to see:
-
Go to the MODERNA website.
-
Click: the PATENTS page.
-
Click: PATENT US 10,703,789
-
Do a keyword search for: Luciferase.
This was too difficult a task for our dishonest horde of corporate journalists. At least one brave soul bothered to do it — and that honest man happened to be a Google software engineer named Zach Vorhies.
Let me repeat: Luciferase is INCLUDED in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent! So I’m right — and the corporate media is wrong. Does this surprise anybody?
The corporate press has already admitted that Luciferase was used in the testing phase of the vaccines as well. So it’s listed in the mRNA sequence of the Moderna patent AND it’s used in the testing of the vaccines but I’m a conspiracy theorist?
One more thing: the new COVID-19 antibody test is called SATiN and it uses Luciferase. No, I’m not kidding. Just click here to see for yourself.
Let me repeat that information: the antibody test is called SATiN.
I don’t know about you, but I’m not getting anywhere near this dark stuff. Just listen to how the SATiN test works:
“We basically incubate those three little molecular biological pieces with a prick of blood,” Stagljar says. “And if there are antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood, these antibodies will ‘glue’ the three parts of luciferase into a functional molecule that will start shining.”
In other words, you need to have COVID-19 antibodies present to make the enzyme glow. When the glow occurs, the researchers can then measure the amount of light emitted with an instrument called a luminometer. The more antibodies a person has, the brighter the luciferase will shine. There’s something very wrong here. You know it and I know it. You don’t have to be a Christian to understand: names matter. It’s not an accident that they’ve given this name to this test. It’s a warning.
He who has ears, let him hear.
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/luciferase-was-bad-but-it-gets-worse
No, this is just information I collected when I saw it. Most of it I took from Bitchute. Actual research needs to be done if indeed this a true phenomenon. Someone needs to check their DNA to see if they're 100% human. They all need to be identified and watched over time.
You could do that in an alternate world where you can track down random TikTok babies and obtain DNA samples and then find someone who actually knows what they're doing to analyze it for non-human DNA.
...or you could research the video itself. Where did it come from? Who made it? What resources did it pull to compile the information? Can I contact this person and verify their credentials? Can I find some secondary source that verifies this stuff?
The goal of research isn't to assume everything is true until you can't prove that it is. That would allow almost everything to be taken as truth without verifications.
Verify, THEN trust. Not the other way around.
I'm not trusting. I am taking note of what is being reported. I stated it still needs to be researched to find out IF it is indeed a phenomenon.
Consider the Covid jab contains mRNA. It is not out of the question this could have an affect on babies. In many of the reports they are saying both parents were injected before conception of the baby. We already know that the spike proteins are concentrated in the female and male gonads - ovaries and testes.
If events are happening more often than normal, it needs to be at least noted and investigated.
Observation is a big part of science.
Observing verifiable phenomena is a big part of science.
Believing what you see from the media is not, as u/Zeitreise is fond of reminding everyone.
If I watch something happen in a microscope, that's science. If I do a mathematical breakdown of a metanalysis, that's science (as long as I show my work and have it checked). I can observe that it thunders after every lightning strike, because I can verify that information myself.
This video says it's showing babies gaining superpowers and weird medical symptoms as a result of being born to two unvaccinated parents.
Is it? What part of that statement can I actually verify?
Can you verify no filters are making the babies look weird?
Can you verify that these babies might not have legitimate medical conditions unrelated to the vaccine from this video?
Can you verify that these babies definitely came from vaccinated parents?
Can you verify who put these videos together and what their motivation to do so might be? Could they potentially be a nutjob, or someone who wants to make you look like a nutjob?
Can you verify anything about these babies at all?
Watching a video on the internet is not research. Believing a video on the internet is not research. It's just believing what's on the internet.
Asking scary questions is the easy part, but it's 5% of research. If you can't even verify that this video is asking a question based on a valid observation of reality (because you can't verify anything about it), then you can't really claim it within the realm of science or evidence. It's just a scary video on the internet.
W. H. A. T. E. V. E. R. 🙄
If I get banned from social media for reporting the conclusions of my research, I know I'm on the right track.