Our facility, which is a very large facility averaged 1 death per month during the peak
Back when they said morgues were spilling over with bodies.
You are comparing 1 death per month in a facility using Rem against media reports that morgues were spilling with bodies. Is this the entirety of the reason for your belief it worked? Why dont you compare it with the doctors who treated using various protocols that does not include Rem and had 99.9% success rates?
How can you rule out that the Remdesivir did not cause the death of those 1 per month?
You missed the point entirely there. The one death per month was giving credit to how well our facility handled peak covid. If bodies were piling up at other facilities than ours was obviously doing something right. But i was called a liar for trying to "down play it".
Now the treatments that we used during peak covid are being smeared. Now that we have indisputable evidence showing rem is saving lives, those same people again are calling me a liar. They cant have it both ways. Either rem kills and i lied about low death rates, or it in fact doesnt kill.
Thats great if others are having success. I dont want other treatments to fail to make me right, like some of you appear to want.
Cultures rule that out. Like ive said many times in these threads cultures are taken before and after. And we've never seen any harm caused by rem or else it would have been stopped, simple as that.
I've personally seen amazing recovery and amazing recovery, 2-3 day turn arounds, people getting off vents or avoiding vents all together because of rem.
There were also only 99 reported deaths associated with rem in the US, it would be very unlikely our facility alone accounted for 7 of those. Nearly 14%.
All of the evidence is overwhelmingly on one side of this coin.
Now that we have indisputable evidence showing rem is saving lives, those same people again are calling me a liar.
You still havent backed this up. So asking again, do you have anything else to back this up or are you still using the 1 death per day metric to come to this conclusion?
First of all it was a 1 per month average. Secondly, youre not listening. People in degrading conditions are reversed with rem. Patients with fluid on the lungs are cleared up in days. That is saving lives. Pnemonia would almost certainly have taken many many more people without rem clearing their lungs so quickly.
This is literally what i do for a living. 12 hours a day, 60+ hours a week for 2 years.
I am giving him a fair chance to at the very least back up his claim. Lets see if he can manage to do that or if he simply continue to throw personal attacks
You are comparing 1 death per month in a facility using Rem against media reports that morgues were spilling with bodies. Is this the entirety of the reason for your belief it worked? Why dont you compare it with the doctors who treated using various protocols that does not include Rem and had 99.9% success rates?
How can you rule out that the Remdesivir did not cause the death of those 1 per month?
You missed the point entirely there. The one death per month was giving credit to how well our facility handled peak covid. If bodies were piling up at other facilities than ours was obviously doing something right. But i was called a liar for trying to "down play it".
Now the treatments that we used during peak covid are being smeared. Now that we have indisputable evidence showing rem is saving lives, those same people again are calling me a liar. They cant have it both ways. Either rem kills and i lied about low death rates, or it in fact doesnt kill.
Thats great if others are having success. I dont want other treatments to fail to make me right, like some of you appear to want.
Cultures rule that out. Like ive said many times in these threads cultures are taken before and after. And we've never seen any harm caused by rem or else it would have been stopped, simple as that.
I've personally seen amazing recovery and amazing recovery, 2-3 day turn arounds, people getting off vents or avoiding vents all together because of rem.
There were also only 99 reported deaths associated with rem in the US, it would be very unlikely our facility alone accounted for 7 of those. Nearly 14%.
All of the evidence is overwhelmingly on one side of this coin.
You still havent backed this up. So asking again, do you have anything else to back this up or are you still using the 1 death per day metric to come to this conclusion?
First of all it was a 1 per month average. Secondly, youre not listening. People in degrading conditions are reversed with rem. Patients with fluid on the lungs are cleared up in days. That is saving lives. Pnemonia would almost certainly have taken many many more people without rem clearing their lungs so quickly.
This is literally what i do for a living. 12 hours a day, 60+ hours a week for 2 years.
I am giving him a fair chance to at the very least back up his claim. Lets see if he can manage to do that or if he simply continue to throw personal attacks
You linked evidence debunking yourself. My gosh, the fact that you cant see that is very telling how poorly educated you are.
We never discussed EMR, look at the lies from you. Constantly, what a disgusting person.