There is a test called Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which uses a 4 letter code. E/I N/S T/F P/J. It identifies inate strengths and weaknesses. Everyone has characteristics of ALL of the letters, but in different proportions. So, a person may have a lot of Extrovert, and only a bit of Introvert. Or a lot of Feeling, and very little Thinking (logic). What I'm seeing is that these traits are inherited, passed down from generation to generation.
The N letter of the indicator is for intuitive, this is the creative letter, the head in the clouds type processing of information. The opposite is the S indicator, for sensing, which is for the hands on, immediate needs using one's senses method of processing information. Every letter combination has both strengths and weaknesses, and it isn't tied to race, sex, or country. However, if you have a group of S people all getting married to each other, odds are that most of their kids are also S.
These letters can be used to evaluate your skills for potential jobs. The majority of women are Feeling types, and it appears most Democrats are too, based on their demands that all decisions be based on "feelings". Whole cities, states and countries can be pegged as a particular type, though many individuals there are totally different types.
Most Emergency Room and police workers are S types; they have natural skills in using their senses to process information. SJ types are extraordinarily hard workers. ISTJ types are the natural accountants, and ENTJ types are natural CEO's.
My take on your post is that you're saying most Chinese are S types, and not N types. Skin color has nothing to do with it. So, not racist, merely an observation of skill sets.
That does relate as well, even though I wasn't specifically referring to that. So, yes, I suppose you could say that Asians (because it's a similar tendency across Asian countries) would tend more towards the S type. As with anything statistical, it can only be applied generally and has no meaning to the individual (except to say; because of X my odds of being impacted by Y is Z%).
As for nature vs nurture, the only solution is a weighting of both.
Communism encourages conformity and obedience while discouraging and punishing natural curiosity, creativity and the noncompliant. Some of the most creative and brilliant Americans are of Chinese descent.
Sorry in advance for the wall of text.
There is a test called Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which uses a 4 letter code. E/I N/S T/F P/J. It identifies inate strengths and weaknesses. Everyone has characteristics of ALL of the letters, but in different proportions. So, a person may have a lot of Extrovert, and only a bit of Introvert. Or a lot of Feeling, and very little Thinking (logic). What I'm seeing is that these traits are inherited, passed down from generation to generation.
The N letter of the indicator is for intuitive, this is the creative letter, the head in the clouds type processing of information. The opposite is the S indicator, for sensing, which is for the hands on, immediate needs using one's senses method of processing information. Every letter combination has both strengths and weaknesses, and it isn't tied to race, sex, or country. However, if you have a group of S people all getting married to each other, odds are that most of their kids are also S.
These letters can be used to evaluate your skills for potential jobs. The majority of women are Feeling types, and it appears most Democrats are too, based on their demands that all decisions be based on "feelings". Whole cities, states and countries can be pegged as a particular type, though many individuals there are totally different types.
Most Emergency Room and police workers are S types; they have natural skills in using their senses to process information. SJ types are extraordinarily hard workers. ISTJ types are the natural accountants, and ENTJ types are natural CEO's.
My take on your post is that you're saying most Chinese are S types, and not N types. Skin color has nothing to do with it. So, not racist, merely an observation of skill sets.
That does relate as well, even though I wasn't specifically referring to that. So, yes, I suppose you could say that Asians (because it's a similar tendency across Asian countries) would tend more towards the S type. As with anything statistical, it can only be applied generally and has no meaning to the individual (except to say; because of X my odds of being impacted by Y is Z%).
As for nature vs nurture, the only solution is a weighting of both.
Communism encourages conformity and obedience while discouraging and punishing natural curiosity, creativity and the noncompliant. Some of the most creative and brilliant Americans are of Chinese descent.