The Truth About Cryptocurrencies: A Clearheaded Guide to the Crypto World
(www.expensivity.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
I think Bitcoin might be a white hat project. I think Satoshi Nakamoto was possibly a team of people from within the NSA.
Gavin Andresen was invited by the CIA to talk about Bitcoin and that's when Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared forever. And as we know, a war has been going on between the CIA and parts of the NSA for some time now.
Bitcoin has been hated by TPTB from the beginning and that's because they are scared of Bitcoin. Just the amount of FUD generated by the mainstream concerning Bitcoin shows that Bitcoin is a good thing for the people.
Just remember, Bitcoin is to central banking (cabal power) what torrenting is to Hollywood and the music industry.
If you've followed the scene for a long time, then you would know that bitcoin has been under many types of attacks. Many underhanded ones, many infiltrating ones (core team infiltration e.g. mike hearn etc), attacks from state actors. Undeniable. They succeeded with some and failed with other (block size failed, segwit shit, segwit2). And that's just the protocol layer. Then on and off ramps have been regulated into hell and back. Regulators acting like each agency can regulate it their own way. It was painted - and still is by IMF crew etc. as only criminals and drug users use it online.
When they're out of fiat USD printing power - they are OUT OF POWER. This is the big one.
Your emphasis on printing power is apt. They could convert all their USD to cryptos now. They would be the richest crypto holders. Maybe they are already. In fact, I have no doubt many of the world's most evil people have huge stakes in crypto.
But it doesn't matter. They can only spend their crypto. They're no longer able to directly and indirectly cheat the system. They can spend their money. That's it. They become a mere market participant and must make sound economic decisions or like anyone else - they will lose it all. They can't create tails I win heads I win becuase ain't gonna be a lot of takers for their script.
They will all fall apart under the slightest breeze. They've been protected and coddled by their own massive bloated structures of dishonestly - all built on the fed lie.
If you have something to offer this world, you should welcome the collapse of the fed's dollar. It's gonna be great!!!!
Others may be a bit saltier about it.
If Satoshi had a middle name I bet it would start with an A.
As in Nakamoto Satoshi A.
Japanese surnames are first then given names.
Remember August 1st 2017.
That was the day the cabal officially captured Bitcoin and the crypto resistance began.
The market decided that they wanted to continue with bitcoin core and not with bitcoin cash. I don't see how the cabal "captured" bitcoin.
And if Bitcoin Core has been captured, why did they introduce Taproot which makes Bitcoin harder to track?
Actually the market was captured via the same psychological tactics that the DS uses now and the promise of regulation and stability. I remember the glory days of bitcoin when it was all cryptoanarchist cypherpunks and the government had no clue what to do about it. It wasn't until Wikileaks announced they were accepting Bitcoin that the CIA caught wind of it and Satoshi disappeared.
Then, somewhere along the line, the narrative changed from "peer-to-peer digital cash to free the world" to "HODL HODL HODL LAMBOS TO THE MOON" and everyone seemed to forget that Bitcoin was always capable of scaling for global adoption. They convinced everyone that Bitcoin had an inherent flaw that was like a technological brick wall that they could not overcome. That "flaw" was actually put in by design by Satoshi and he always intended to remove it eventually.
The reason for the big crash at the end of 2017 was that BTC blocks were full due to the artificial 1MB block limit which caused transaction fees to hit over $100. The network was backlogged for weeks and for the first time in history some bitcoin transactions failed. Raising and/or removing that limit is all that needed to be done, but the Core team absolutely refused to do this citing that it would lead to centralization because average people would not be capable of running a full node (a completely illogical red herring argument).
Nevermind that non-technical people have no idea what a full node is or what it does, but that ideology meant that bitcoin would only ever be useful to tech-savvy people. Even though there are hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of people using bitcoin to survive in communist countries. This shows it is not necessary to understand it all on a technical level, as long as you understand the principles of how it works and how to use it properly, you're good to go.
Bitcoin Core developers, who are employed by Bilderberg, work on attracting the legacy financial system to adopt Bitcoin as a parallel currency, and also leading the masses to believe it's a financial lifeboat. I believe they are manipulating the price through stablecoins and planning on another big crash after a big pump where BTC will hit over $100k and then quickly crash to below $10k, and it will be engineered using the same "flaw" that caused the 2017 crash that no one ever did anything to fix (except Bitcoin Cash did, and still works perfectly to this day).
Everything Core has done since they were taken over by Blockstream, including Taproot, SegWit, Lightning Network, etc has been an elaborate system meant to distract from that fundamental argument while clearing the way for institutional investors, third-party surveillance, making transactions less private, reversible, and slow while steering newbies onto their custodial services they have set up.