If the data was already uploaded to a blockchain but requires a cipher to decode the encrypted data and also the exact location within the blockchain, all that would be needed is for Assange to send a few emails, or perhaps even a blockchain transaction of some kind.
It would be like the art (images, videos, documents etc) already being stored/saved behind one door somewhere in the world, but you need the key and the exact address to be able to access that art.
Assange provides the key and the address, the artist collects the art and puts it on display.
It has long been suggested that Assange has copies of the original blackmail material used to keep world leaders in check. With the invention of Deepfake it can be argued that any videos that do emerge are just deepfakes.
However if Assange managed to get hold of them and uploaded them to a blockchain somewhere in an encrypted form, that upload will also have date and time stamps within the blockchain that can't be faked and that could prove that they were uploaded before the invention of Deepfake, meaning they are real videos and are a real problem for some very important people.
Not saying it's real or not, but it certainly is possible.\
Edit: OP had another post linking to here showing how images can be stored in a blockchain. Just saw that post.
See here for how images can be stored in a blockchain.
Now imagine multiple images being stored in a blockchain like Bitcoin, or Etherium, or any one of the many blockchains. Each image being a single frame of a video file.
Images can be saved as binary values of 1's and 0's.
Those values can also be encrypted so that no one can just stumble across them randomly. Those can then be converted and stored in the data that makes up the actual blockchain.
Blockchains can store all transactions with information such as the date and time that particular transactions occurred. This data can not be removed from the blockchain and are for ever, basically.
A blockchain is a distributed database that stores massive amounts of information in an extremely long string of values (numbers and letters) that can contain all sorts of information like financial transactions, date and time data, contract data, and even 1's and 0's that form the basis of digital image formats as well as digital video formats... basically any data you want to store. If data can be digitised, it can be stored within a blockchain.
Some blockchains are designed to store things like images or videos. That's where you get your NFT's. It's a digital verson of an image or a certificate or something that can also save details on the owner of that NFT and also any transactions of that NFT, like who sold it to who for how much and when. Also data like who every previous owner was.
Basically, a blockchain can be used as a massive distributed database and can contain any digital information you want with exact timestamps as to when that digital information was added to the blockchain.
Older blockchains such as Bitcoin don't really have any uses other than transaction information of Bitcoins changing hands. But newer blockchains can store anything that the blockchain designer wants to store, such as contract information or possibly card movements in each hand for a game of Poker (in the case of blockchains designed for gambling).
Blockchains store data, it's up to the program that runs each blockchain to use the data stored within the chain of blocks, i.e. the blockchain.
I've probably rambled a bit, but I hope that helps to explain some of it.
I've been into "conspiracy" stuff for almost 20 years, I like looking at everything, whether I think it's true or not, I still look into it,,,, so, that being said, It was actually around the time that Q started posting, maybe a couple months before, I found a strange group of characters, programmer/hacker/cicada3301 types, on twitter, not really the nicest people I've ever met on the internet but some were cool, and some of them fawned over a couple a.i.'s like they were mind reading gods and could transcend time and manipulate reality, and "archillect", a bot made by Pak, was one of them.
I just found a video about it from 2017, I've never seen it before, but I know it's gonna be some weird shit.... It'll be like we're watching together.
Not to mention that WikiLeaks has already used bitcoin to store information
The 2.5 megabyte Cablegate file was stored in 130 separate transactions each holding 20,000 bytes of data, transactions 5c593b7b71063a01f4128c98e36fb407b00a87454e67b39ad5f8820ebc1b2ad5 to 2663cfa9cf4c03c609c593c3e91fede7029123dd42d25639d38a6cf50ab4cd44#o6". Each transaction includes a trivial 0.00000001 bitcoin donation to the Wikileaks donation address 1HB5XMLmzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v. This data is stored in checksummed download tool format.
Unscramble Muratpak and you get: aka trump... That video I linked pointed that out in 2017... Such a strange turn. This movie just did some wierd crossover/cameo scene,,,,
How dafuck do you "do a collaboration" with some sketchy artist when you're in solitary?
If the data was already uploaded to a blockchain but requires a cipher to decode the encrypted data and also the exact location within the blockchain, all that would be needed is for Assange to send a few emails, or perhaps even a blockchain transaction of some kind.
It would be like the art (images, videos, documents etc) already being stored/saved behind one door somewhere in the world, but you need the key and the exact address to be able to access that art.
Assange provides the key and the address, the artist collects the art and puts it on display.
It has long been suggested that Assange has copies of the original blackmail material used to keep world leaders in check. With the invention of Deepfake it can be argued that any videos that do emerge are just deepfakes.
However if Assange managed to get hold of them and uploaded them to a blockchain somewhere in an encrypted form, that upload will also have date and time stamps within the blockchain that can't be faked and that could prove that they were uploaded before the invention of Deepfake, meaning they are real videos and are a real problem for some very important people.
Not saying it's real or not, but it certainly is possible.\
Edit: OP had another post linking to here showing how images can be stored in a blockchain. Just saw that post.
See here for how images can be stored in a blockchain.
Now imagine multiple images being stored in a blockchain like Bitcoin, or Etherium, or any one of the many blockchains. Each image being a single frame of a video file.
Images can be saved as binary values of 1's and 0's.
Those values can also be encrypted so that no one can just stumble across them randomly. Those can then be converted and stored in the data that makes up the actual blockchain.
Blockchains can store all transactions with information such as the date and time that particular transactions occurred. This data can not be removed from the blockchain and are for ever, basically.
A blockchain is a distributed database that stores massive amounts of information in an extremely long string of values (numbers and letters) that can contain all sorts of information like financial transactions, date and time data, contract data, and even 1's and 0's that form the basis of digital image formats as well as digital video formats... basically any data you want to store. If data can be digitised, it can be stored within a blockchain.
Some blockchains are designed to store things like images or videos. That's where you get your NFT's. It's a digital verson of an image or a certificate or something that can also save details on the owner of that NFT and also any transactions of that NFT, like who sold it to who for how much and when. Also data like who every previous owner was.
Basically, a blockchain can be used as a massive distributed database and can contain any digital information you want with exact timestamps as to when that digital information was added to the blockchain.
Older blockchains such as Bitcoin don't really have any uses other than transaction information of Bitcoins changing hands. But newer blockchains can store anything that the blockchain designer wants to store, such as contract information or possibly card movements in each hand for a game of Poker (in the case of blockchains designed for gambling).
Blockchains store data, it's up to the program that runs each blockchain to use the data stored within the chain of blocks, i.e. the blockchain.
I've probably rambled a bit, but I hope that helps to explain some of it.
No problem mate, glad I could help.
Holy shit..... Pak and Assange working together is kinda fucking my head up. Looking into muratpak turns into a really strange dig.
Do tell!
I've been into "conspiracy" stuff for almost 20 years, I like looking at everything, whether I think it's true or not, I still look into it,,,, so, that being said, It was actually around the time that Q started posting, maybe a couple months before, I found a strange group of characters, programmer/hacker/cicada3301 types, on twitter, not really the nicest people I've ever met on the internet but some were cool, and some of them fawned over a couple a.i.'s like they were mind reading gods and could transcend time and manipulate reality, and "archillect", a bot made by Pak, was one of them.
I just found a video about it from 2017, I've never seen it before, but I know it's gonna be some weird shit.... It'll be like we're watching together.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/T0dpKGNnD7A3/
Weird shit is a good synopsis!
Not to mention that WikiLeaks has already used bitcoin to store information
The 2.5 megabyte Cablegate file was stored in 130 separate transactions each holding 20,000 bytes of data, transactions 5c593b7b71063a01f4128c98e36fb407b00a87454e67b39ad5f8820ebc1b2ad5 to 2663cfa9cf4c03c609c593c3e91fede7029123dd42d25639d38a6cf50ab4cd44#o6". Each transaction includes a trivial 0.00000001 bitcoin donation to the Wikileaks donation address 1HB5XMLmzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v. This data is stored in checksummed download tool format.
Unscramble Muratpak and you get: aka trump... That video I linked pointed that out in 2017... Such a strange turn. This movie just did some wierd crossover/cameo scene,,,,
Seems to me that's what Blockchain tech and the crypto wave is really meant for. Just another way for [them] to hide [their] blackmail evidence.
Assange has had plenty of time to prepare some surprises.
WHACKD 2.0 ?