Perhaps it is you with the reading comp deficit. You said: ”Book burning is IMMEDIATELY associated with authoritarian dictatorships by the vast majority of people. Go ask anyone you pass on the street "what comes to mind when i say "book burning"?" And see what they say.“ To which I said “If someone associates a church with authoritative dictatorship in any context , that’s on them, not my problem.”, in the CONTEXT that it’s the CHURCH burning the books; I did not say you said the church was an authoritative figure. You’re playing semantic gymnastics and accusing me of the very thing you’re doing. Disingenuous or an idiot. I don’t care that you don’t like it, ”Its unfortunate that its such an awful idea” you say, at the same time you claim this ”Lmfao i literally explicitly said i dont care if you have a bonfire. Use whatever fuel you want.” Bottom line, it’s my post and I stand by it 100%. Your feelings affect my stance not one bit, nullius pretii. Any further response by you will go ignored, but feel free to babble to yourself if it makes you feel “right”.