Wow, does the propaganda in the astronomy and basic sciences world really get this bad? Poor flat earthers!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 Obvious Trap 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (322)
sorted by:
I love how anytime there's disagreement here it's due to blindness etc. I've researched chemtrails extensively - they are simply not feasible (esp having worked in aerospace myself). I've researched HAARP just extensively enough to easily debunk it. I've researched FE just enough to laugh at the "reasoning" on the websites.
It's not a "blind spot" to actually accept established science considering that such is by definition always open to challenge.
There are hundreds/thousands of very easy to find scientific papers outlining geoengineering in operational, not theorotical, use going back decades. So, yes, I would call that a gigantic blind spot, unless it is intentional, but I'll definitely give you the benefit of the doubt.
Cloud seeding != chemtrails.
Lol, It absolutely is! Of course I personally believe there is a hellava more more going on than that, but cloud seeding is undoubtedly geoengineering. Confused why you would even suggest that, when 100% of "mainsteam science" says it is?
Yes cloud seeding has been a thing openly talked about in newspapers as far back as the 1950s. Is that the same as chemtrails though?
Yes