What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.
You don't know much. System engineering integrates all the design functions of an airplane. Credentials matter to separate those who understand the science and methodology from those who don't. Gas physics, aerodynamics, thermodynamics, atmospheric science...they are all under my belt. You continue to have no credentials. You don't say how old you are, so you are probably lacking experience. Here I mention that I have dealt with the possibility of designing a "chemtrail," and you want to say I don't know anything?
My view of a "tiny area"? Have you ever seen the aircraft plant in Everett, Washington? Bold talk for someone who is nowhere close to the action. Has an aerial lab sampled anything? I doubt that any such activity would ever be approved by the FAA, as it would require violation of the flight separation requirements. No evidence. Are you sure you aren't sampling meteoric dust? About 14 tons deposit on Earth every day. Same composition as your malignant materials. We do have aircraft that "sniff" for radioactive isotopes to detect nuclear detonations...but I don't think they are being used for "chemtrail" detection.
I assume you are referring to the hoax footage about the ballast system on a developmental airplane? Somebody is playing you like a fiddle. I've already viewed these BS videos of hoax expose, and a complete ignorance of contrails. Evidently, you can't do better than that.
Cloud cover? Where do you live? As a native of Puget Sound, I think I am an expert on cloud cover. We have plenty of it. And nothing is harmed thereby. We have verdant growth that requires constant maintenance to keep from overwhelming houses and property. Contrails have no effect on the received sunlight, compared to normal weather.
And you can't even be concerned about the real chemtrails from rocket exhaust. I think it is quite funny that I have to be the one to inform you about that. I give you something real...but not part of your narrative. You don't want to touch it. So much for your aspirations to be a scientist.
What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.
You don't know much. System engineering integrates all the design functions of an airplane. Credentials matter to separate those who understand the science and methodology from those who don't. Gas physics, aerodynamics, thermodynamics, atmospheric science...they are all under my belt. You continue to have no credentials. You don't say how old you are, so you are probably lacking experience. Here I mention that I have dealt with the possibility of designing a "chemtrail," and you want to say I don't know anything?
My view of a "tiny area"? Have you ever seen the aircraft plant in Everett, Washington? Bold talk for someone who is nowhere close to the action. Has an aerial lab sampled anything? I doubt that any such activity would ever be approved by the FAA, as it would require violation of the flight separation requirements. No evidence. Are you sure you aren't sampling meteoric dust? About 14 tons deposit on Earth every day. Same composition as your malignant materials. We do have aircraft that "sniff" for radioactive isotopes to detect nuclear detonations...but I don't think they are being used for "chemtrail" detection.
I assume you are referring to the hoax footage about the ballast system on a developmental airplane? Somebody is playing you like a fiddle. I've already viewed these BS videos of hoax expose, and a complete ignorance of contrails. Evidently, you can't do better than that.
Cloud cover? Where do you live? As a native of Puget Sound, I think I am an expert on cloud cover. We have plenty of it. And nothing is harmed thereby. We have verdant growth that requires constant maintenance to keep from overwhelming houses and property. Contrails have no effect on the received sunlight, compared to normal weather.
And you can't even be concerned about the real chemtrails from rocket exhaust. I think it is quite funny that I have to be the one to inform you about that. I give you something real...but not part of your narrative. You don't want to touch it. So much for your aspirations to be a scientist.