I can't be the only one seeing this, so if this is old, let me know and I'll delete. Also, I'm glossing over a lot of technical details for the sake of clarity. I or others can answer them in the comments.
Short and sweet: 5G technology has been mocked as a tech solution looking for a problem. The problem is the massive data flood coming from the clot shots.
3G brought internet, better txting, etc. 4G brough bandwidth for multimedia, and streaming, better data throughput.
5G brings a massive increase to volume of devices and bandwidth, but to what end? 4k video? 8k video? Nope, the reality: biometrics and control.
With a high bandwidth frequency you drop range substantially; we're no longer talking miles, we're talking city blocks...and only a couple/few of those.
So best excuse from legacy media/trade rags for this that I've heard is ...smart cars???
Yeah no. How about smart people? As in, we suspected nanotech being in the clot shots, we had some evidence, now we have confirmation coming in from around the world. 5G is being focused on the cities, 80-90% of the population.
Conclusion, 5G is the solution to how you control a population, infused with nanotech with 24/7 live monitoring & control of vitals for billions of people,starting with the population centers.
To a certain degree, yes. But a lot of the "towers" they are planning are a rooftop, smaller assembly, some building mounted, and theyre toying with the idea of car manufacturers putting nodes in future cars to create mesh distributed networking.
Makes it harder to find, much less disable the network.
I have visions of the futuristic Terminator movies... where small patrols of resistance fighters are secretly going around and dismantling the infrastructure.
I know nothing of which I speak, but seems like there could be a headphone or hearing-aid type thing which could emit 'negating' frequencies at the ear level to nullify the 5G emissions for those susceptible (the jabbed) to their influence.
Whatever frequency is being used, you would have to match it and flood that frequency with "white noise", basically a cell phone blocker. There are already strict broadcasting laws against this, not that at that point it would matter as much.
Also depends on how/what the nanotech does. If it requires a signal in order to keep the person alive, or if interrupting the signal renders them inert.