I have no allegiance to Jews, nor any knowledge enough to be sympathetic to their cause. If it is in fact organic and altruistic, taking a mad dash to blame Jews for the problems we face (rather than simply bashing the elite, cabal, etc.) seems like a really dumb strategy given the importance of redpilling braindead normies. Whether or not the anti-Jew narrative is accurate is completely irrelevant if we're truly playing to win. So why do it? Just say fuck the globalists and be done with it so the brainwashed normies don't sprint away for good before taking the redpill.
I do know that the powers that be will go to great lengths to subvert any inkling of a populist movement. America First, I imagine, is no exception. Psy-ops and infiltration/subversion have come a long way since Vietnam. If that's what the sudden Jew hate is, you turds really suck. What a boring existence.
As I read "The Thirteenth Tribe," by Alan Koestler, a very scholarly history of the Khazars, I realize that there is a lot more to the migration and lineage of the Jews than just "evil Khazarian mafia." For instance, there was a Jewish diaspora even before the Romans totally crushed Jerusalem. The Semitic Jews were already spread between Persia and Spain, south to Ethiopia, north to Russia. The Khazars already knew about Judaism when they converted in 740, which was also the high point of their influence. The Jews in Spain felt the Khazars were somewhat heretical because for a long time they did not adhere to the Talmud. By 1150 the Khazar empire was crumbled. They didn't have an Ashkenazi empire without Semites and it didn't persist in a secret mafia society for 800 years. Even back then, all the wandering Jews were Zionists waiting for the messiah that would bring about their earthly kingdom.
So this history produced a lot of tough survivors and opportunists. Just as Christianity produced a lot of nasty individuals, like the ones who justified slavery. Sticking to personalities instead of categories is a fairer way to judge.
The split happened in Babylon, after the first Temple destruction and wholesale move of Jews to Babylon as teachers and builders, and not as slaves as many claim. Once there the split happened exactly over the "Talmud", Tanah", "Kabala", etc. Those who believed there is only Torah, and no "interpretation" of it such as Talmud, split up and went North. Some settled in what is Southern Russia now, joined Khazars, and some went North, still. There is a village in Baltics, need to do a search as my memory is a bit foggy on this right now, but they still live the Olden Way today, read and trust only Torah and nothing else. I cringe every time I see Talmud books in movies, friends of ours sent me a large set of Kabala, as a gift, I never opened the large box it came in, and eventually threw it out.
I recently met someone in NY, Russian Jew who became very religious since leaving Soviet Union, and once he uttered "Tanah" to me in our discussion of Jewish history I stopped him and said that I am no longer interested in the discussion, pointing out his reference to Tanah as the reason. Torah, to me, is same as the Constitution, there should not, and cannot be ANY "interpretation" and once I hear anyone mention an "interpretation" of either I am done. Cast in stone. And, BTW, Torah has been "adjusted" somewhat from its origins. Main one in Genesis where the original read "elohim", not "eloh". Humongous difference that will blow plenty of minds (plural vs. singular). There are others, especially in the interpretations of Old Testament as it made it through centuries of "translations" to other languages. The only question I have is, Were these badly translated words a real error, or a deliberate effort?
Spain wise, pronounce "Iberia", its olden name. EE beh ree ya. Now pronounce Hebrew (with the H almost silent or very light as it was back in the day). Yes, long subject, and plenty of "experts" out there re-writing history. Including the "fabled" Greek alphabet the Greeks supposedly invented. Take older Hebrew alphabet and place it in front of a mirror. Voíla! Old Greek. Every time some "history" book claims "Phoenicians", you can be assured it really means Jews. The world famous "banking system" supposedly created by Knights Templar was really the system they copied from, hmmm, the "Phoenicians", the system long proven by then (centuries upon centuries of traders). Its difficult to sort through facts lately with so much disinfo out there.
Speaking of history, can anyone, please, show me "Ukranian" currency pre-1991? Inquiring minds want to know. Can someone in US Congress show me such currency? And this is very recent, time wise, now imagine history that was altered, one way or another, centuries ago? Many a time deliberately so.
Koestler (Arthur, not Alan as I mistakenly said) mentions the spread of the Hebrew alphabet through Khazaria and to Russia and Croatia. The Babylonian split has led to interesting local traditions and family names through the eastern part of the old Persian empire, all the way to Pakistan. The Hebrew Jews were much more present all over Europe than I had been led to believe by the simplistic "Khazars/Ashkenazi are not real Jews" story. The pressure on the Jews in Palestine and later persecution by the Christians forced them there. Arabia is complicated too.