We are now seeing the criminal globalists attempting to pivot from "Covid will kill everybody" to "Covid will cause HIV, which will cause AIDS, which will kill everybody -- but it's definitly not the vaccines that caused any of this harm, so take your vaxx."
So, I wanted to create a thread of a post I wrote in another thread. This way, I can reference this thread in the future, and others here can debate this subject.
My initial research into HIV/AIDS led me to conclude that HIV was real, but it did not cause AIDS, because AIDS is nothing more than a made-up definition, and not a real physical syndrome.
Later, I discovered that people were saying HIV also is not real (does not exist).
Now, I have concluded that all viruses are made-up fantasies, because virologists ALL use a method to "study a virus" that is not valid.
We know that PCR is a technique, and is not something that can diagnose any illness. Likewise, nobody has ever actually seen a virus, captured a virus to study, or studied a virus. What they are looking at are cellular fragments of poisoned cells in a lab (not in a person), and everything else from there is pure speculation, not scientific at all.
Regarding HIV/AIDS, it is helpful to understand the history of how things have progressed over the past 50 years.
AIDS - Originally to Explain Gay Illnesses
AIDS does not exist as a real thing in the real world. Instead, it is just a definition, which is used to create fear in the public and money into the bank accounts of the fraud promoters.
In the 1970's, gay men in San Francisco were getting weird illnesses, some of them died. Michael Gottlieb (a Fauci co-conspirator) came up with the term GRID ("Gay-Related Immune Deficiency") as an explanation. There was NO scientific research to base this on. It was just a guess.
They tried to get grant money to "study" this thing (that did not really exist), but they came up empty because nobody wanted to spend money to help out the fags in San Fran.
So, they changed the name to AIDS ("Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome"). They claimed that anyone could get it (not just homosexuals). AGAIN, they had absolutely NO scientific evidence for this. It was just a made-up claim.
"HIV Causes AIDS" -- a Claim With No Science Behind It
Robert Gallo invented the "smoking gun." This is what changed everything. He claimed that he discovered that HIV was a virus that caused AIDS. The media went crazy with it, and the public panicked. Now, everybody could get a deadly illness just by having sex.
The money poured in, and Anthony Fauci was the ringleader for this scam.
At this point, they started doing HIV tests. And those tests were bogus. They could NOT diagnose anything. Kary Mullis spoke out against using the PCR technique as a diagnostic tool for HIV. But they continued doing it.
AIDS is nothing more than a definition. IF (a) you have one of 30+ illnesses listed by the CDC, AND (b) you test positive for HIV (with a bogus test), THEN you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but test negative, then you "just" have the illness, but not AIDS.
There is NO scientific research to prove this. NONE.
Robert Gallo would later state on the record that he NEVER had any proof. It was ONLY an hypothesis.
But the money rolled in.
So, what is the TRUTH?
The Truth About HIV/AIDS
The truth is those homos in San Francisco were part of the new "free love" movement that was sweeping the country in the 1960's/1970's. They were the gay subculture of it.
They created bath houses to have casual sex in. But their kind of sex is unnatural, so they used drugs to relax the anal muscles. They used Amyl Nitrate ("poppers") which turned out to be highly toxic to humans.
Plus, they were using recreational drugs to party for days at a time without going to sleep.
This "gay lifestyle" is what caused their bodies to build up with toxins, and they developed all sorts of nasty illnesses. Some of them died.
The Drugs Killed the AIDS Patients
Once the false "HIV causes AIDS" story became the narrative, they would test people for HIV. If they were positive (using a bogus test), and if they also had one of those 30+ illnesses listed by CDC, then they were diagnosed as having "AIDS."
They were then put onto "AIDS drugs" like AZT, which was a failed chemo drug. AZT is EXTREMELY toxic.
Cancer patients are given toxic drugs for a LIMITED time period to kill off cancer cells. But AIDS patients were put on these drugs FOREVER. These drugs killed them.
That's why they eventually stopped using these highly toxic drugs. It was too obvious what was really going on.
And once this was all figured out, AIDS just "went away."
There was a time when people were in fear of having sex. Now, nobody really even thinks about AIDS.
Until now ... because they have recently attempted to bring back the fear porn for HIV.
Just like Fauci led the fake scam of HIV/AIDS (and controlled the $$$$$), he has been leading the fake scam of SARS/Covid. Now that they have maxed out what they can to get everyone taking the fake Covid vaccines, they are pivoting to HIV, to scare more people into taking what will be the fake HIV vaccines.
They are pivoting to "Covid causes HIV, which causes AIDS, which causes serious illnesses -- because it's definitly not the fake vaccines that caused all those sudden illnesses, that did not exist before the fake vaccines were unleashed."
Get it?
Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR, explaining how he realized that there is no science behind the "HIV causes AIDS" scam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnFAvKJe9VE
"House of Numbers" is the best documentary I have ever seen about the history of HIV/AIDS, and why the "scientists" cannot answer very basic questions. It was done more than 10 years ago, before Covid, and you will see a lot of the Covid players in it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k7168G95ecNT/
The 2021 research that proves that NO viruses exist:
https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html
What [They] are Planning Next
They have recently changed the PCR "diagnostic" they are using. They have not done away with PCR; they are just changing the inputs. It is still not a diagnostic tool, but is being used as a diagnostic tool.
The plan is to make the claim that you just take one "test" and you get multiple results. You can be "diagnosed positive" for Covid, HIV, Herpes, and anything else they want to dream up. But no matter what, you WILL be postiive for something, even though you have no signs of sickness at all. Unless, of course, you are a good little lemming/slave and do not rock the boat.
This is to get the mRNA vaxx into your body. Injecting everyone at ALL COST is the goal.
Why?
There are no good reasons why, only bad reasons.
Nicely done. Slyver is clearly new to this debate, which to those who are unaware has been raging since the early days of "HIV." "Scientists" these days have been indoctrinated in the new science of purification where you basically do the opposite and drown it in jargon, computer algorithms and a myriad of supercilious nonsense until no one knows which way is up. They sneer at Koch's postulates and other such old science that would easily pull the rug out. If Slyver is actually wondering what isolation and purification would look like to one of these old time scientists, the so called Perth Group has detailed this ad nauseum: http://www.theperthgroup.com/. The general idea is there must be a "gold standard" of isolated and purified "virus," using the classic methods of centrifuge, EM characterization, etc. Otherwise, the genome you are calling "the virus" may be something else entirely and you must resort to inference or guesswork. You further must show that it and IT ALONE can cause sickness. Otherwise there is unlimited potential for fraud and all manner of shenanigans, aka, "Virology." This is why the manufacturers of PCR tests will admit in the fine print that they do not start from said "gold standard" when sourcing the respective genetic material for replication (unfortunately without such a gold standard, we have no idea what is actually being replicated) That way if the house of cards ever falls, the blame has been shifted up the pyramid. "We used the best available commercial material, it's not our fault no one ever isolated or purified." Have you not wondered how these "viruses" can be both abundant enough to cause illness and require HAZMAT suits while at the same time being too difficult to get enough of a sample from a sick person to run a simple isolation experiment? You can't have it both ways. If we all had to wear masks to prevent the virus from spreading it stands to reason that it should be easy enough to get some mucus, run it in a centrifuge, draw material out of the band where the "virus" would be if it was there and see what you see under EM. The virus research community has somehow accepted through groupthink and peculiar reasoning that this is somehow unnecessary. Why bother, the computer software can assemble the puzzle into more grant money. And there is the crux: no official source will ever fund a gold standard experiment, and dissenters can't afford a centrifuge and EM. Also, lets be honest, even if they ran 100 trials and found no virus every time, few would hear about it and even fewer would care. The virus scam was more or less designed to be unfalsifiable, with top down funding and authority, proprietary materials and equipment, high security labs, and gleeful crushing of all opposition (just ask Peter Duesberg). You would think it would give a well meaning researcher pause when they find themselves defending an edifice constructed by the likes of Gallo and Fauci. Its amazing how much self delusion can arise from the strange alchemy of student debt and ego involvement. Publish or Perish. And no journal is going to publish anything that truly threatens the golden goose. More significantly, they are much too smart to have been fooled. The first Tarot card is the fool for good reason. You must first see yourself as the fool before you can walk the path of knowledge.
Excellent post.
I don't know how many people are still checking out this thread, but you stated it well.
A very interesting thing to do is watch that 2nd link I posted in my OP for the "House of Numbers" video. Fast forward through and only watch the Q&A for the "experts" who are interviewed (including Fauci, Gallo, and virologists). They often refuse to answer, and when they do, it is always double talk and evasive non-answers.
If they were honest people, they would just answer the question simply and clearly. But as you said, they have created a complex weave of obfuscation to the point that there is no such thing as a straight-forward answer from anyone. In most cases, they get either angry or arrogant that anyone would dare question their fundamental premeses.
Like Slyver, they ASSUME things without evidence. And that leads to nothing but error and evasiveness.