I only have time at the moment to put this together quickly. But pay attention to what more pro-Trump media outlets are saying now compared to MSM. Many of them make phrases that are in-line with Q posts. For example, Newsmax released a segment today on the new Durham revelations regarding Clinton's involvement and the anchor said, "Drip, drip, drip". Pay attention and you'll hear more Q confirmations (Newsmax, OAN, Fox, Epoch Times, etc.).
Meanwhile, in MSM land, in order to reverse the damage that has done to the warped/brainwashed mind, you have to "unwind" this damage by doing it slowly through the very sources who are responsible for propagating these brainwashing techniques in the first place. This inadvertently forces their viewers to be more 'accepting' of the information that is presented to them.
It starts off like this:
Let's use CNN as an example. You run hit pieces on Trump 9/10 times and 1/10 times you put out a story that blasts the DS/Dems/Biden/MSM. After a few months, you run 8/10 hit pieces on Trump and 2/10 that look bad for the DS/Dems/Biden/MSM. This is for pure optics and is a gradual process that must be this way so that it doesn't appear forced or moves too quickly. This process continues until the stories pushed are around 50/50 in terms of optics. Then you present scandals to the public within these MSM organizations (like CNN: Cuomo, Lemon, Zucker, etc) which inadvertently forces their viewers to question the legitimacy & credibility of the SOURCE of their information. Then, it's up to the viewers to come to their own conclusions because there is now great contrast as to what is actually true, what their being told and what they actually believe.
Additionally, once these newly "awakened" viewers begin to witness censorship first-hand by MSM and thru their social media platforms, then there is no way to put the genie back into the bottle. Now you have someone who finally thinks critically and finally begins to question the SOURCE. This is also why Truth Social is so important, but I digress....
Q posts regarding 4am talking points and taking control:
Post #2459:
....
The 'Red Line' months old 4am narrative should be updated.
Pain coming.
Q
Post #561:
MSM is FAKE NEWS.
Propaganda.
Talking points [4am] - private email addresses.
Paid contractors.
JUDGEMENT DAY.
Q
Post #564:
Counter-narrative went out @ 4am to MSM contractors [like clockwork].
Russian bots.
These people are REALLY REALLY STUPID.
....
MSM contractors #Goodbye#
Fight, fight, fight.
Q
Take a look at other Q posts regarding "4am". It gives more reason as to why Q wrote:
News unlocks MAP
Watch the news
We are in control
Backchannels are important.
Information warfare.
Does it all make sense now?
Remember, Q knows MSM connections to FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc: https://qalerts.app/media/815fac8a883a93181848875a1308e7149007f8d271462dcb47374192206934bb.png
Deals were made and they will do as told.
The GREAT AWAKENING :)
But I don’t want deals to be made. We have been told, No Deals! I’m sorry but these people whom have nearly destroyed our minds all must be removed/replaced with totally new faces if they continue. And those gone must go to jail, prison, swing, and, and those companies be fully open to civil class-action law suits that they can’t win, that destroys them/shuts them down.
Of course really, we don’t need FakeBook, ABC, CNN or MSNDNC! They should also have their broadcasting licenses stripped during investigations. So if you turn to their channel or website, all you get is the old-school blue or Rainbow screen with that annoying buzzer telling you it’s offline. Letting them to continue to run, regardless of their news delivery shift is continued trauma to millions of people. I’m sorry but it’s like letting a rapist walk free during their court trial. But in this instance we have a legal broadcasting license that I’m sure can be stripped while they’re being investigated for both criminal and civil liability. Channels got shut down periodically and at night during the 70s and early 80s. It’s time we do that again to these criminals that can still assault people, with their fake news and Pfizer-like killing ads even as I type! And sure as shit it shouldn’t be allowed this far in, by any moral White Hat that controls the “bullhorn” on this period. That’s my media Soap-Box
Unless small deals lead to big fish. It wouldn’t be a compromise of the “no deals” statement at all, if deals are needed to undo the entire thing. I mean that’s fairly common, frying some smaller fish to get to the sharks.
I mean you let a couple of these minor faggots save their skin to get Obama, Hillary, BIDEN, Comey, Brennan… I take that.