"If I give you a key to my house and ... it's not like ... burglary" - What about if you lie to a judge to get an illegal warrant for the key, read the diary, and give a copy of the diary to my political opponents (all without me knowing) is that "like" any kind of crime? - The Great Awakening

"If I give you a key to my house and ... it's not like ... burglary" - What about if you lie to a judge to get an illegal warrant for the key, read the diary, and give a copy of the diary to my political opponents (all without me knowing) is that "like" any kind of crime? (www.washingtonpost.com)

posted 2 years ago by king07828 2 years ago by king07828 +20 / -0

2 comments

2 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (2)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Sadness 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Also these are DNS lookups. It could be anything, certainly not grounds for proving that Trump was colluding with the Russians.

Freshly minted blog-posts have heaps of Russian bot traffic. Doesn't mean blog authors are talking to Russians. I suspect something like this is going on. However, the problem lies in the motivation of these people. Fundamentally they were trying to dig up dirt on a presidential candidate, and subsequently a sitting president.

So to continue the metaphor: the diary was a log of internet traffic that included random bot-traffic: like weather reports on the other side of the world that were auto-filled in the hypothetical diary. The techies involved with this knew it, but they still went ahead with the charade.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q