That seems about when I would have seen it, seems like it was on r/TD or TD.win. It was quite well written but not so well received because readers couldn't believe, or didn't want to believe, that all those sealed documents didn't pertain to spygate. I didn't save it.
No, it was never on any pro-Q forum (not the one I'm talking about). I saw it on a rabidly anti-Q forum where they were desperately trying to debunk the sealed indictments. They ended up debunking themselves and didn't even realize it (which was hilarious to read). They are trying to believe that sealed indictments are just things like "speeding tickets". This is the same crowd that probably went on to triple mask.
Are all those sealed indictments about Spygate? No, of course not. There are many other criminal matters, but even the lawyer on that anti-Q site admitted that even two years ago there were an abnormally high amount of sealed indictments. Even he could see that it was far higher than it should be. It's only grown since then. Along with shills desperation to believe nothing is happening.
The problem is that no one is clearly defining what they count as "part of the Deep State". Do you count the criminal arms (drug and human trafficking and hit men) side of the DS? Do you count indictments against Antifa and MS-13 criminal elements (arms of the DS)? If so, then a lot of those indictments would be against members of the criminal arms.
If the definition is only politicians and ceos and media figures then you narrow what are indictments against the DS.
Also do they only count Durham's indictments? There are many indictments happening outside of Durham's massive investigation. So when people talk about the number of Sealed Indictments they really need to define who they mean by "Deep State". Who are counting as part of it? It's a rather massive structure that's being dismantled.
Do they mean the number of Durham-only sealed indictments?
That seems about when I would have seen it, seems like it was on r/TD or TD.win. It was quite well written but not so well received because readers couldn't believe, or didn't want to believe, that all those sealed documents didn't pertain to spygate. I didn't save it.
No, it was never on any pro-Q forum (not the one I'm talking about). I saw it on a rabidly anti-Q forum where they were desperately trying to debunk the sealed indictments. They ended up debunking themselves and didn't even realize it (which was hilarious to read). They are trying to believe that sealed indictments are just things like "speeding tickets". This is the same crowd that probably went on to triple mask.
Are all those sealed indictments about Spygate? No, of course not. There are many other criminal matters, but even the lawyer on that anti-Q site admitted that even two years ago there were an abnormally high amount of sealed indictments. Even he could see that it was far higher than it should be. It's only grown since then. Along with shills desperation to believe nothing is happening.
The problem is that no one is clearly defining what they count as "part of the Deep State". Do you count the criminal arms (drug and human trafficking and hit men) side of the DS? Do you count indictments against Antifa and MS-13 criminal elements (arms of the DS)? If so, then a lot of those indictments would be against members of the criminal arms.
If the definition is only politicians and ceos and media figures then you narrow what are indictments against the DS.
Also do they only count Durham's indictments? There are many indictments happening outside of Durham's massive investigation. So when people talk about the number of Sealed Indictments they really need to define who they mean by "Deep State". Who are counting as part of it? It's a rather massive structure that's being dismantled.
Do they mean the number of Durham-only sealed indictments?