The lower standard the less children identified as "developmental delays". They probably expect this kind of issues as a result of the vaxx so by lowering the standard they also lower the stats of potential ill children.
It's like changing the definition of myocarditis to: "myocarditis isn't when you suffer heart pain, ost when you already have died", so when you survive - it wasn't myocarditis. That way you reduce the stats by 5x (assuming that 80% of people survive).
What does disease control have to do with standards for early childhood development?
You're being facetious here.
The lower standard the less children identified as "developmental delays". They probably expect this kind of issues as a result of the vaxx so by lowering the standard they also lower the stats of potential ill children.
It's like changing the definition of myocarditis to: "myocarditis isn't when you suffer heart pain, ost when you already have died", so when you survive - it wasn't myocarditis. That way you reduce the stats by 5x (assuming that 80% of people survive).
Exactly-Notta