3
praying71 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do I see it correctly? Is it right on the way to the White House?

Is it where the MSM have to walk for the press conference … before they ask about a MN man?

One level up in trolling game. Trump makes these liars look more and more ridiculous, even in their own eyes. Yet they go and keep lying.

Edit: Yes. https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxQ3HdUl/msnbc-is-melting-down-over-the-l/c/

2
praying71 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s too far fetched.

… will likely investigate …

  • will = in the (unknown) future
  • likely = may not happen at all
  • investigate = the result of the investigation can be: nothing found

All 3 words together = in the unknown future RFK may (or may not) start an investigation that may (or may not) find anything.

7
praying71 7 points ago +7 / -0

The blue label says: Kari-Out Co.

Are we going to hear something big from Kari Lake?

1
praying71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ooops, Google pepe #7 has 666 - that one is “incompatible”, KEK

2
praying71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just replace the url with x.com

https://x.com/amyklobuchar/status/1915823476826362143

I posted a “nitter” version because X doesn’t allow to read the comments anonymously. You have to login to read.

2
praying71 2 points ago +2 / -0

This deserves a sticky, considering other events today.

5
praying71 5 points ago +6 / -1

It can be a message to the anons: “It’s happening” without triggering a massive “Rrreeeee” from the leftards:

  • post gets noticed by us quickly (goal achieved),
  • post gets deleted,
  • the leftards can only see our own posts referring to the original non-existing post, so they conclude: “yeah, it’s another conspiracy theory”.
7
praying71 7 points ago +7 / -0

Now imagine a positive effect, optics-wise.

We suffered, mastering our patience, but all these indictments being unsealed now, under Trump’s government, just think: how efficient this new DOJ is going to look like.

1
praying71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. He said that during covid.

And we know that covid didn’t end then, which means - he was referring to something else.

I remember this interview because it was one of the things I was wondering about since then: What did he have in mind?

Some era seems to be ending today.

5
praying71 5 points ago +5 / -0

“Terrible May” was years ago shortly after the post, when in one month (and it was May) dosens of bishops have resigned in one country in South America.

2
praying71 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a great site called QMap, which had a very good explainer for each post.

A person who maintained it was identified by their employer and ostracised so they had to delete the site.

Does anyone has a copy of it?

I hope that person will recover the site at some point.

1
praying71 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw the same in London, UK, for years, near the Home Office.

They’ve been conducting some never-ending pavement replacement near the Home Office so that people were discouraged to walk there and advised to use alternative routes.

The betrayal is on very high levels. It won’t stop until the Epstein files are fully released and people learn not only about the blackmails but also about the agendas of those who controlled it.

3
praying71 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was always legal. She just made it over the counter.

3
praying71 3 points ago +3 / -0

^ This.

Also:

  • Term limits in politics.

  • Funds limits in pharma R&D.

They either find the cure and start monetising it, or we assume it’s “incurable” so the funding stops after the limit, at what point the cures would miraculously pop up everywhere.

Stick and a carrot: funding limit as a stick and award prizes as a carrot.

If they don’t take it - their competition will do it for free, at their own cost to get the product to the market.

9
praying71 9 points ago +9 / -0

The big pharma knows it’s unstoppable.

That’s why they want to create new diseases to “build the market” for their own future.

They will lose the R&D funds they take from every single country to “find a cure” for the “incurable” cancer.

They need another scary and “incurable” disease(s).

view more: Next ›