See, the concept of people you love being in a "Satanic cult" would freak YOU out.
I would find it mildly amusing that apparently intelligent, resourceful people believed in the mystical powers of Satanic sacrifices, when not even mainstream Satanism believes in anything remotely supernatural.
Would I be upset that they murdered children in pursuit of their hilariously-misguided beliefs? Absolutely. As upset as I am that cartels traffic drugs sewn into children and serial killers rape and kill people. I'm not incapable of empathizing with human suffering.
But nothing even you've accused the Cabal of doing is any worse than the things I've seen actual proof of happening. So if the Cabal is doing those things, then that's horrible, and it's also not going to drive anyone insane to know that.
The media-addicted sheeple PAY MONEY to see graphic depictions of crimes FAR WORSE than anything you've accused the Cabal of doing. And oftentimes, it's our beloved celebrities we're watching doing these horrible things on screen. Finding out Christian Bale actually cuts up women is not going to make me vomit in pure confused agony.
I don't "love" celebrities, dude. I enjoy some people's artistic output. But if they're bad people, then fuck them. They should be in jail or whatever consequences is appropriate. It doesn't remotely unsettle me. I enjoyed seeing Kevin Spacey's work in House of Cards, and am totally comfortable with him being blacklisted following his accusations (even though they totally ruined the show's final season as a result).
Your entire concept of liberal fragility regarding "television" and "celebrities" is a straw-man argument you've created to justify the way you need to believe the world is and make yourself feel stronger for believing the things you do.
If there is some video out there of Hillary Clinton sucking adrenochrome directly from the brain of a screaming child, then Q should upload that video right now. I am ready to see it. I don't know if everyone will watch it, but if I watch it and it's verified by Q's real-life exposed credentials as someone I should trust, then I will turn Q believer at this moment, as will everyone else who sees that video. And then we will tell people who can't watch the video what the video is and add our own authority to it, which is all the sheeple need anyway, right?
So let's do it. There is not a single celebrity you could "take from me" that will leave me sleepless. Show me the insanity-inspiring proof and I'll roll the dice that my brain won't melt as a result.
Q is welcome to send such a video directly to me through these forums if he/they'd like. If Q is who you believe, then he/they already know enough about me to know that I'm representing myself fairly here. I'd be happy to begin sharing it myself. And Q would know enough about me to know I'd be an excellent person to convert for many reasons.
If I've abandoned thinking for myself and just blindly obey authority, then all I need is proof that Q is actually an authority and has proof. That's it. Then I'm on the Q train. Blind followers of authority should be the easiest converts if Q is who you believe.
Q's words are not proof of anything. They're mostly vague prophecies written by an anonymous chan user. I know you have constructed connections between these posts and world events, but that has always been after the fact (future proves past).
You've never said, "I predict this major, obvious thing will happen publicly on this day because of Q post#" and then that prediction came true. You've merely insisted that certain events that are currently occurring or have occurred are proved by interpreting certain Q posts the way you believe.
Proof means I can apply this logic and make predictions about the future. I haven't been able to do that with Q posts.
Can you make a specific prediction for a specific timeframe, right now, based on a Q post? Are you willing to see if your interpretation of Q is actually scientific and can make testable predictions about the future?
We can try it. Show me a Q post right now, and tell me what that Q post says will happen, and when. I will set a reminder on my clock.
If you can't do that, then you have the answer to your question.
Then Q should have no real problem manipulating me in the other direction with a shocking video proof of Hillary Clinton eating a brain and Q showing their faces as authorities who can credibly claim to have verified the video. I'm apparently very gullible and will believe anything someone with a badge tells me is true, so if Q has one, we're good.
See, the concept of people you love being in a "Satanic cult" would freak YOU out.
I would find it mildly amusing that apparently intelligent, resourceful people believed in the mystical powers of Satanic sacrifices, when not even mainstream Satanism believes in anything remotely supernatural.
Would I be upset that they murdered children in pursuit of their hilariously-misguided beliefs? Absolutely. As upset as I am that cartels traffic drugs sewn into children and serial killers rape and kill people. I'm not incapable of empathizing with human suffering.
But nothing even you've accused the Cabal of doing is any worse than the things I've seen actual proof of happening. So if the Cabal is doing those things, then that's horrible, and it's also not going to drive anyone insane to know that.
The media-addicted sheeple PAY MONEY to see graphic depictions of crimes FAR WORSE than anything you've accused the Cabal of doing. And oftentimes, it's our beloved celebrities we're watching doing these horrible things on screen. Finding out Christian Bale actually cuts up women is not going to make me vomit in pure confused agony.
I don't "love" celebrities, dude. I enjoy some people's artistic output. But if they're bad people, then fuck them. They should be in jail or whatever consequences is appropriate. It doesn't remotely unsettle me. I enjoyed seeing Kevin Spacey's work in House of Cards, and am totally comfortable with him being blacklisted following his accusations (even though they totally ruined the show's final season as a result).
Your entire concept of liberal fragility regarding "television" and "celebrities" is a straw-man argument you've created to justify the way you need to believe the world is and make yourself feel stronger for believing the things you do.
If there is some video out there of Hillary Clinton sucking adrenochrome directly from the brain of a screaming child, then Q should upload that video right now. I am ready to see it. I don't know if everyone will watch it, but if I watch it and it's verified by Q's real-life exposed credentials as someone I should trust, then I will turn Q believer at this moment, as will everyone else who sees that video. And then we will tell people who can't watch the video what the video is and add our own authority to it, which is all the sheeple need anyway, right?
So let's do it. There is not a single celebrity you could "take from me" that will leave me sleepless. Show me the insanity-inspiring proof and I'll roll the dice that my brain won't melt as a result.
Q is welcome to send such a video directly to me through these forums if he/they'd like. If Q is who you believe, then he/they already know enough about me to know that I'm representing myself fairly here. I'd be happy to begin sharing it myself. And Q would know enough about me to know I'd be an excellent person to convert for many reasons.
If I've abandoned thinking for myself and just blindly obey authority, then all I need is proof that Q is actually an authority and has proof. That's it. Then I'm on the Q train. Blind followers of authority should be the easiest converts if Q is who you believe.
Q's words are not proof of anything. They're mostly vague prophecies written by an anonymous chan user. I know you have constructed connections between these posts and world events, but that has always been after the fact (future proves past).
You've never said, "I predict this major, obvious thing will happen publicly on this day because of Q post#" and then that prediction came true. You've merely insisted that certain events that are currently occurring or have occurred are proved by interpreting certain Q posts the way you believe.
Proof means I can apply this logic and make predictions about the future. I haven't been able to do that with Q posts.
Can you make a specific prediction for a specific timeframe, right now, based on a Q post? Are you willing to see if your interpretation of Q is actually scientific and can make testable predictions about the future?
We can try it. Show me a Q post right now, and tell me what that Q post says will happen, and when. I will set a reminder on my clock.
If you can't do that, then you have the answer to your question.
Then Q should have no real problem manipulating me in the other direction with a shocking video proof of Hillary Clinton eating a brain and Q showing their faces as authorities who can credibly claim to have verified the video. I'm apparently very gullible and will believe anything someone with a badge tells me is true, so if Q has one, we're good.