Most news organizations are just disseminators of news that originates in a few "legitimate" organizations. That has been the case for ages. Most editors and reporters learn early on that they can repeat news from the New York Times, for example, but not from some random person's blog. This is allegedly so the news they report has some credibility. But what if the "legitimate" sources are corrupt, as we know they are?

Some reporters are psychopaths pushing the cabal's agenda. They know they're reporting lies. They have contempt for the average person and don't care if they're hated by them.

But not all reporters are in that category. Some reporters believe the New York Times and their ilk are legitimate. They travel in circles in liberal cities where everyone else does, too. Some reporters know better, but do what the job requires because that's their job. Some reporters know better, but feel they can do some good working within the system, finding ways to work in information from outside the approved channels their audience would otherwise never hear. Some reporters are clueless, pay no attention to politics and have no idea what's going on. They just like being on TV.