Why are there so many Truth Social Threads that have been stickied??? WTF is the deal when most say the same damned thing??? "TRUTH SOCIAL IS/WENT LIVE"... Come on mods, you're better than this... I get the excitement about it but for pete's sake... One or two is sufficient, not the 9 or 10 that are stickied...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
It almost feels like a distraction, doesn't it? Only available on apple from the gate, where have we seen this behavior before? Is this the first live date we were expecting, I almost feel like we were promised this a while back, getting a frankspeech vibe. I am not suggesting that it isn't what was promised but do we know what was promised anymore? Has anyone looked into this to see if it is really linked with Trump? I KNOW that in the past his name has been used as a way to garner attention for a project, he would essentially lease his name. If he were under some kind of contract that someone could use his name whenever they launched something this could actually be another group entirely just trying to make some quick money.
If this were the real deal I would suspect that Trump had already acquired all the necessary code to simply GO LIVE and not drag it out like it is being done. No body expects the Digital Acquisition.
No idea what is going on though. No idea why it wouldn't have a desktop option either, mobile only and not even all of them. I wonder if it has anything to do with the practices we have heard employed by Huwai.
I believe that Truth social is part of Trump's plan and that he's behind it 100%... I also believe that it's excitement at the first social media platform that truly embraces freedom of speech... My small gripe (and small it is) is that there are so many threads saying the same thing... Cheers Anon... ☕☕☕
That is what alludes to it being a distraction to me. I also noticed methods in the terms of service that would suggest it isn't entirely supportive of free speech, many forms being removed before they would even be seen. I understand the necessity of maintaining a civil platform but I feel like the potential to remove content before it is viewable isn't in line with free speech. I don't like hearing things that I do not like to hear, I am human like that, but I feel it important to be able to identify those that would "abuse" that right so that I can make a conscious decision to follow/unfollow certain content/providers. Also they hold claim to any and all content posted to their site, much like facebook, twitter and snapchat had situated themselves. They own your content. Just want to make sure it isn't happening like it has always happened. Also saw somewhere that it was to be 18+ with many enjoying to idea that they wouldn't have to worry about a bunch of snotty trolls but I am seeing that for apple at least it is listed as 12+, this could be misinformation though.
Agreed... ☕☕☕
hmm that's interesting. I'm wondering if this has something to do with DWAC.
Nobody expects the Digital Acquisition! {i am going to make that a thing!}
But DWAC had caught my attention. I was under the impression that everything was already got so I was anticipating a very smooth launch. I have noticed a trend of bumpy launches with most new things surrounding a lot of what we have been trying to accomplish getting out. So flags everywhere! Could just be me. Some fancy ideas are starting to circulate that it was some kind of move to take out apple. We will see is the best I can surmise. Didn't spend all that time digging to stop now though. We were warned to be careful who we follow.