I was correct. That specific aircraft is a CRJ-200 that the company uses for the United Nations charters. And it is parked at the headquarters of the company that owns it, which is headquartered in North Bay, Ontario.
As far as the evidence shows, there is absolutely nothing suspicious about a UN aircraft sitting at the HQ of the company that owns it. They were there long before the truckers showed up.
I'm sure it's possible to wring a conspiracy out of this somehow, but it has plenty of reasons to be there that don't involve ferrying in undercover UN troops.
BTW, please remember this next time you accuse me of not researching your sources.
It can't be that something boring and routine got spotlighted and debunked as anything interesting. Everything that seems important to me MUST be important, and if it doesn't appear important, it's probably because THEY are hiding something about it. Not because someone found a pattern in something that was not a pattern and made a bad assumption.
Do I have that correct?
And to be clear, you're the one who says that I'm not researching. How did I find such an obvious clue as a tail number in a video like that before you said anything? In your own source?
My initial analysis was done without a tail number because the video was too dark. I wasn't even aware there was a video with a tail number, and you were. You could always have proven who owned this thing just with a quick search.
Did you not see the tail number and realize that you can just look that up to see who owns the plane? Did you not watch the video? Or did you not make the connection about the importance of this evidence until I pointed it out after doing your own research?
One of us dug deeper into that source than the other, and all you posted was the link. At this point, you trying to mock me about the depth of my investigation feels like you trying to save face for downvoting me and then posting a resource to both me and the OP that you thought was going to counter me, but actually just proved my theory.
The underserved superiority you've demonstrated to me since the beginning needs to be reigned in, man. It's never panning out, and research doesn't need to be an intelligence contest.
Predicting that a human trafficking sting is going to occur during the Superbowl in one of the country's largest cities when it happens every year in many large cities (and is easily researchable) isn't exactly demonstrating the prowess you're hoping it would.
14 minutes in, I have a shot of the tail number.
C-FXLH. Blurry, but I can make it out.
So does that belong to the company I tracked down?
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Voyageur-Airways
Yep.
I was correct. That specific aircraft is a CRJ-200 that the company uses for the United Nations charters. And it is parked at the headquarters of the company that owns it, which is headquartered in North Bay, Ontario.
As far as the evidence shows, there is absolutely nothing suspicious about a UN aircraft sitting at the HQ of the company that owns it. They were there long before the truckers showed up.
I'm sure it's possible to wring a conspiracy out of this somehow, but it has plenty of reasons to be there that don't involve ferrying in undercover UN troops.
BTW, please remember this next time you accuse me of not researching your sources.
Uh...
Alright. Sure.
It can't be that something boring and routine got spotlighted and debunked as anything interesting. Everything that seems important to me MUST be important, and if it doesn't appear important, it's probably because THEY are hiding something about it. Not because someone found a pattern in something that was not a pattern and made a bad assumption.
Do I have that correct?
And to be clear, you're the one who says that I'm not researching. How did I find such an obvious clue as a tail number in a video like that before you said anything? In your own source?
My initial analysis was done without a tail number because the video was too dark. I wasn't even aware there was a video with a tail number, and you were. You could always have proven who owned this thing just with a quick search.
Did you not see the tail number and realize that you can just look that up to see who owns the plane? Did you not watch the video? Or did you not make the connection about the importance of this evidence until I pointed it out after doing your own research?
One of us dug deeper into that source than the other, and all you posted was the link. At this point, you trying to mock me about the depth of my investigation feels like you trying to save face for downvoting me and then posting a resource to both me and the OP that you thought was going to counter me, but actually just proved my theory.
The underserved superiority you've demonstrated to me since the beginning needs to be reigned in, man. It's never panning out, and research doesn't need to be an intelligence contest.
Because at a certain point, after finding nothing, and digging, and finding nothing, and digging, you are no longer really digging for truth.
You're digging in hopes that the people waiting for you at the top get bored and leave, because otherwise, they might know you were wrong.
And it's not always easy to know when you've crossed the line from suspicious to desperate.
You predicted that a human trafficking sting would happen in LA around the Super Bowl?
2022 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/nearly-500-people-arrested-california-human-trafficking-sting-operation/
2021 https://www.wfla.com/news/hillsborough-county/dozens-arrested-in-super-bowl-human-trafficking-sting-sheriff-says/
2016 https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2615991-superbowl-50-human-trafficking-sting-unveils-dozens-ofvictims-and-suspects
Yeah, the Superbowl is a major time for human traffickers to get work done, and they do stings all over the country every year over Superbowl weekend.
Atlanta, 2019 https://www.11alive.com/article/sports/nfl/superbowl/fbi-over-100-arrested-in-metro-atlanta-super-bowl-child-sex-trafficking-sting-several-children-recovered/85-949c965c-9fb2-4b03-9714-0690aaa53774
Multiple others: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28607449/the-super-bowl-remains-target-human-trafficking
Predicting that a human trafficking sting is going to occur during the Superbowl in one of the country's largest cities when it happens every year in many large cities (and is easily researchable) isn't exactly demonstrating the prowess you're hoping it would.