That “genetic manipulation” theory is taken from Sitchen’s shoddy work. Man had already been ‘sentient’ and evolving for hundreds of thousands of years.
The Annunaki most likely descend from the ‘Adam & Eve’ lineage, ‘celestial’ beings in origin, not extraterrestrial. Their material bodies were created here for the purpose of upstepping the existing human races, not through genetic tampering but thoughtful breeding and cultural progress. That didn’t work out so well.
Yes it’s much more complex. And no I do not evaluate Sitchen from a biblical context at all, but from an academic critique of his translations, from actual peer-reviewed scholars of ancient languages.
What Sitchen claims is written is not there, he just manufactured a narrative, and as he was funded with Rockefeller money it’s no surprise.
Though the editors who compiled the texts of the Bible selected some of the best spiritual writings, they failed to clean up all the contradictions as a historical document. Remember Cain went to the Land of Nod to search for a wife? Well the Nodite culture existed for about 200,000 years before the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve were not the first humans.
These Nodites were, you could say, genetically ‘altered’ — but not by way of ‘aliens.’ The initial group was ‘brought’ here, but this extra-planetary origin was not a fellow sphere of advanced mortals. Could you say they were “extraterrestrial”? Yes, if you expand the definition to include “celestial.”
That’s not to dismiss the reality of current ‘visitors’ to the planet and the long covered up, undeniable evidence. But it does counter who is ‘in charge.’
My theory is that the advanced culture that “suddenly” appeared in Sumeria was a blend of these Nodites and the survivors of the children of Adam.
To be clear, we have not been altered by aliens. The fact that there is both an evolutionary process and a direct creation stimulus is what eludes both theories. It’s not one or the other.
It is my opinion that whatever influence from ‘aliens’ is more recent, and of those who interfere or manipulate, it is an indication that these are remnant rebel groups — still loyal to the fallen one — who would find willing colleagues among us. Obviously.
I'd have to go back and search through my files, but I recall reading that the grays and reptilian-type creatures get their 'sustenance' from soaking or bathing in a soup of human blood and specific organs. We are just a food crop for them.
They also enjoy the blood and specific organs of other animals, which really seemed to come to the fore in the early 1970s when all of the animal mutilations began happening.
Upon investigation, the animals were found with all of their blood missing and specific organs cut out with laser precision. We didn't understand it then, but we do now...
Is this Bashar?
their history of the annunaki is poorly researched.
That “genetic manipulation” theory is taken from Sitchen’s shoddy work. Man had already been ‘sentient’ and evolving for hundreds of thousands of years.
The Annunaki most likely descend from the ‘Adam & Eve’ lineage, ‘celestial’ beings in origin, not extraterrestrial. Their material bodies were created here for the purpose of upstepping the existing human races, not through genetic tampering but thoughtful breeding and cultural progress. That didn’t work out so well.
Yes it’s much more complex. And no I do not evaluate Sitchen from a biblical context at all, but from an academic critique of his translations, from actual peer-reviewed scholars of ancient languages.
What Sitchen claims is written is not there, he just manufactured a narrative, and as he was funded with Rockefeller money it’s no surprise.
Though the editors who compiled the texts of the Bible selected some of the best spiritual writings, they failed to clean up all the contradictions as a historical document. Remember Cain went to the Land of Nod to search for a wife? Well the Nodite culture existed for about 200,000 years before the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve were not the first humans.
These Nodites were, you could say, genetically ‘altered’ — but not by way of ‘aliens.’ The initial group was ‘brought’ here, but this extra-planetary origin was not a fellow sphere of advanced mortals. Could you say they were “extraterrestrial”? Yes, if you expand the definition to include “celestial.”
That’s not to dismiss the reality of current ‘visitors’ to the planet and the long covered up, undeniable evidence. But it does counter who is ‘in charge.’
My theory is that the advanced culture that “suddenly” appeared in Sumeria was a blend of these Nodites and the survivors of the children of Adam.
To be clear, we have not been altered by aliens. The fact that there is both an evolutionary process and a direct creation stimulus is what eludes both theories. It’s not one or the other.
It is my opinion that whatever influence from ‘aliens’ is more recent, and of those who interfere or manipulate, it is an indication that these are remnant rebel groups — still loyal to the fallen one — who would find willing colleagues among us. Obviously.
I'd have to go back and search through my files, but I recall reading that the grays and reptilian-type creatures get their 'sustenance' from soaking or bathing in a soup of human blood and specific organs. We are just a food crop for them.
They also enjoy the blood and specific organs of other animals, which really seemed to come to the fore in the early 1970s when all of the animal mutilations began happening.
Upon investigation, the animals were found with all of their blood missing and specific organs cut out with laser precision. We didn't understand it then, but we do now...
The cattle mutilations were not sinister at all you say? I disagree wholeheartedly. Do tell why you think they were A-OK.
You can't leave us hanging after a remark like that!