Can I ask you how long you been on here ? I ask because since I got on Jan 2020 I've read studied and research a lot of evidence that has been posted. I mean I've spent more hours everyday than probably most people on here!
You can't honestly think podesta, Clinton biden and so many others have not been involved with hurting children.
If you are saying the evidence that is clear as day will not make court and put these people away, I understand your frustration and we can only believe it will . But, if you are saying that what you have seen are not people who have hurt children I'm not sure what you would need ,, other than being in the same room with them! Pray for the children if you're able because they are being hurt whether you believe it or not . No argument just hoping you really don't believe these people haven't hurt children !
I actually have been awake since 911 myself actually before that , but knew the truth about 911 when it happened , I've been on here since Jan and researched posts but I've know about both podesta brothers for long time ,, not a retard dude , my daughter is what you call clinically retarded atleast that's what they use to call kids with downs , that and mongoloids. Don't throw around retardant so freely , doesn't really offend me but your a jerk off , I spoke very classy and respectful to you , you're angry dick ,, fuck off !
Fuck off dude, your an angry person , you want to throw out your knowledge of Hollywood , I live in San Diego , I bought a beautiful home from the money I made in the modeling industry , I left it because I saw first hand what you claim there is no evidence of ! yes I research posts on here to learn more about the horror that is happening ! BTW mongoloids is still used, I know because older people still use the expression when they have met my daughter, that was a common name for Downs in their generation , so stop with your childish insults. Enough said from me , of course it’s your right to continue your nasty comments !
A: Q provided countless proofs and his claims become true by the day.
B: There's, again, plenty of evidence for the people we call pedos. Look at Podesta and tell me there's no evidence.
Where would I start? Hunters laptop? The little girl that was groped? The little Asian girl that ended up chopped to pieces in a plastic bag after being seen with obama? The countless victims that span past mkultra? The child trafficking rings and tunnels destroyed under trump? The entire pedo island that people keep killing themselves over? are you even fucking paying attention reeree? Of course you’re not, you’re a shill
Definitely understand, and I think it is an important message, even if I don’t agree with the conclusion.
Personally, I think folks like Lynn Wood are egotists are best, and traps at worst, but am fine with anyone disagreeing.
Nonetheless, baseless accusations, if not legally, can still get you in trouble mentally because it leads to a lack of applying critical thinking, in favor of over generalizing.
That said, we know they exist. Epstein’s island and his connections aren’t merely fringe conspiracy theories, or theories at all — they are outright conspiracies. Why did Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and Bill Clinton fly around with Epstein all over Europe and Africa for a month? Why is Biden super molesty with all girls and women? Why did Ashley Biden write in her diary that she would take showers with Joe?
Well, I fundamentally disagree with your assessment of the Q drops. If anything, I think the point was to sow complete distrust of ALL public figures and politicians. To assume they’re all guilty until proven innocent. Simply as a countermeasure to government trust and complacency.
Regardless, all of our discrimination does not take place in a court room. When I walk into a car dealership, I can decide pretty quickly if I’m talking to an honest person or a liar, without having evidence that would be admissible in court to prove that to be the case.
Evidence is whatever proves to the individual, based on their own experiences and biases, that a thing is more likely to be true than not. To pretend we can’t assert anything without undeniable proof is anti-free-speech.
Private individuals can assert whatever they like about a public figure, and are not subject to defamation suits. There are countless examples of case law that hold this up - entering the political ring makes you vulnerable to just about any claim anyone wants to make.
It also wouldn’t make any sense if the indictments were for defamation, that a good portion of the people did turn out to be pedophiles, which so far, has been the case.
To try to defend your position any further than the logical conclusion of “use discernment, and be more aware of your accusations and their impact” would lead me to conclude you are intentionally trying to lead people away from free thinking, and therefore truth.
Oh and "muh sealed indictments are for us" is the dumbest doomer shit I've ever fucking heard.
It's like a copypasta at this point.
Can I ask you how long you been on here ? I ask because since I got on Jan 2020 I've read studied and research a lot of evidence that has been posted. I mean I've spent more hours everyday than probably most people on here! You can't honestly think podesta, Clinton biden and so many others have not been involved with hurting children. If you are saying the evidence that is clear as day will not make court and put these people away, I understand your frustration and we can only believe it will . But, if you are saying that what you have seen are not people who have hurt children I'm not sure what you would need ,, other than being in the same room with them! Pray for the children if you're able because they are being hurt whether you believe it or not . No argument just hoping you really don't believe these people haven't hurt children !
I actually have been awake since 911 myself actually before that , but knew the truth about 911 when it happened , I've been on here since Jan and researched posts but I've know about both podesta brothers for long time ,, not a retard dude , my daughter is what you call clinically retarded atleast that's what they use to call kids with downs , that and mongoloids. Don't throw around retardant so freely , doesn't really offend me but your a jerk off , I spoke very classy and respectful to you , you're angry dick ,, fuck off !
Fuck off dude, your an angry person , you want to throw out your knowledge of Hollywood , I live in San Diego , I bought a beautiful home from the money I made in the modeling industry , I left it because I saw first hand what you claim there is no evidence of ! yes I research posts on here to learn more about the horror that is happening ! BTW mongoloids is still used, I know because older people still use the expression when they have met my daughter, that was a common name for Downs in their generation , so stop with your childish insults. Enough said from me , of course it’s your right to continue your nasty comments !
Calm down ladies. :)
Projection at its last failing.
I fart in your direction.
You posted 3 sentences none have any substance other than fear porn based on zero facts or connection to reality.
I fart again in your direction.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Fart....
Would you like me to break your post down word for word. I have a dictionary?
Don't be stupid.
A: Q provided countless proofs and his claims become true by the day. B: There's, again, plenty of evidence for the people we call pedos. Look at Podesta and tell me there's no evidence.
https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/civil-litigation/defamation-character-free-speech.html
define 'without evidence' you shill
Where would I start? Hunters laptop? The little girl that was groped? The little Asian girl that ended up chopped to pieces in a plastic bag after being seen with obama? The countless victims that span past mkultra? The child trafficking rings and tunnels destroyed under trump? The entire pedo island that people keep killing themselves over? are you even fucking paying attention reeree? Of course you’re not, you’re a shill
at least use that thing called grammar. I fart in your direction again.
Definitely understand, and I think it is an important message, even if I don’t agree with the conclusion.
Personally, I think folks like Lynn Wood are egotists are best, and traps at worst, but am fine with anyone disagreeing.
Nonetheless, baseless accusations, if not legally, can still get you in trouble mentally because it leads to a lack of applying critical thinking, in favor of over generalizing.
That said, we know they exist. Epstein’s island and his connections aren’t merely fringe conspiracy theories, or theories at all — they are outright conspiracies. Why did Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and Bill Clinton fly around with Epstein all over Europe and Africa for a month? Why is Biden super molesty with all girls and women? Why did Ashley Biden write in her diary that she would take showers with Joe?
Discernment goes both ways.
You suck. Am I wrong ? :)
Well, I fundamentally disagree with your assessment of the Q drops. If anything, I think the point was to sow complete distrust of ALL public figures and politicians. To assume they’re all guilty until proven innocent. Simply as a countermeasure to government trust and complacency.
Regardless, all of our discrimination does not take place in a court room. When I walk into a car dealership, I can decide pretty quickly if I’m talking to an honest person or a liar, without having evidence that would be admissible in court to prove that to be the case.
Evidence is whatever proves to the individual, based on their own experiences and biases, that a thing is more likely to be true than not. To pretend we can’t assert anything without undeniable proof is anti-free-speech.
Private individuals can assert whatever they like about a public figure, and are not subject to defamation suits. There are countless examples of case law that hold this up - entering the political ring makes you vulnerable to just about any claim anyone wants to make.
It also wouldn’t make any sense if the indictments were for defamation, that a good portion of the people did turn out to be pedophiles, which so far, has been the case.
To try to defend your position any further than the logical conclusion of “use discernment, and be more aware of your accusations and their impact” would lead me to conclude you are intentionally trying to lead people away from free thinking, and therefore truth.