1
redlotus69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leo XIII also composed the St. Michael prayer, referenced by Q in drop 109. This prayer was also shared by Trump himself. Could be comms.

4
redlotus69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even WITHOUT the auto pen scandal people forget Sleepy Joe did not win 2020.

With or without the auto pen... once that fraud is proven by military intelligence, those pardons won't be worth the paper they're printed on.

1
redlotus69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only forbidden when it's statues of pagan gods to be worshiped. This was confirmed as the second council of Nicea.

If statues and images were forbidden it wouldn't make much sense for God Himself to tell Moses to make a statue in the image of a snake

27
redlotus69 27 points ago +27 / -0

This guy is yet another nutcase pretending to be the chosen one. It has happened hundreds of times.

I'll believe he is the antichrist when he starts performing false miracles. Until then I'm gonna save the pearl clutching.

1
redlotus69 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Pope cannot be the antichrist. False prophet maybe, but not the antichrist. The antichrist will claim to be the true Christ, and that Jesus was a false Messiah. Hard to do while you're the head of a Christian church lol

4
redlotus69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just the latest loon to claim to be the Mahdi. Muhammad Ahmad called and wants his schtick back.

While it is concerning that he is trying to preach to Jews and Christians, it has been traditionally thought that the antichrist will be a Jew from the tribe of Dan

0
redlotus69 0 points ago +1 / -1

"You proved my point right here. If your religion’s practices are not based on scripture then it’s a tradition"

Picking and choosing what scripture to follow. Paul literally says that we should follow tradition in 2 Thessalonians 2:15. Sola Scriptura is not Biblical at all.

"what kind of gobblygook is this?"

Thanks for admitting you have zero idea what you are talking about. One of the Biblical arguments for the concept of ex cathedra infallibility is John 16:13. All papal infallibility means is that when the bishop of Rome is making statements that apply to all Catholic churches he can not be in err (see Matthew 16:18).

"Maybe you should research your own religion."

LOL you are the one who needs to research it, not me.

"It is the harlot mentioned in Revelation"

Who told you that? Jack Chick? Trust me pal, this isn't the first time I've heard the "whore of Babylon is the Catholic church" argument. There are problems with that, for one it's an interpretation that even all protestants don't subscribe to. Furthermore, the Vatican is not one of the seven hills of Babylon as described in Revelation 17:10. The seven hills of Rome are Palatine, Capitoline, Aventine, Caelian, Esquiline, Viminal, and Quirinal. That alone shoots that idea that the Vatican is the Babylon of Revelation (not the Roman empire which was clearly the implication in the text as it was written during the persecution of Domitian) in the foot. Furthermore, Revelation 18:3 clearly states that "the merchants of the earth grew rich from her excessive luxuries". This implies that it is a global commerce hub (again PAGAN Rome sure as hell not the Vatican which has zero export afaik)

"It claims the power to change the Sabbath"

Are you a Seventh Day Adventist by chance? The Catholics did not "change" the Sabbath. The Sabbath was not changed, it was replaced by the Lord's Day (Revelation 1:10) in Christian worship.

"change the 10 Commandments which were written by the hand of God Himself"

The commandments aren't bulleted in the text. You can count as many as 13 or even 14 commandments and as a result, Jews, Catholics AND protestants all number them differently. The Catholic numbering was based on Augustine's writings after he studied Deuteronomy closely. Protestants were the ones who altered the ten commandments to split the first commandment into two and then combined the last two into one so they could "own" the Catholics over "muh statues" (forgetting that God Himself commanded statues of living things to be made namely the snake in Numbers 21:8). Even the fucking LUTHERANS use the Catholic ten commandments. It was protestant reformer John Calvin who altered the commandments in 1545 because he was an iconoclast. The Catholics did not change the commandments, if anything, protestants did.

AGAIN, please do some actual historical research outside of a Chick Tract.

-1
redlotus69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

LMAO your source is gotquestions? Nice one. Unironically quoting an anti Catholic website regarding Catholicism is like quoting Mossad shill Alex Jones to prove Q isn't real. Next time try reading what Catholics actually believe instead of what people CLAIM they believe.

Pray to statues? Nope. That's bullshit. Been a Catholic my whole life never seen or heard of anyone praying to a statue.

If you're expecting a scripture reference for every last thing Christians do you'll be looking for a while. But that being said there are scriptures that are interpreted this way by Catholics. David calls upon the angels in Psalm 103:20-21 as a prayer. The intercessory prayers of the saints are described in Revelation 5:8.

Jesus is God. Mary is the mother of Jesus. Therefore she is the mother of God. This isn't rocket science. Elizabeth calls her "the mother of my Lord" in Luke 1:43. In fact, the hail Mary itself comes primarily from Luke 1:28. Among the titles given to her by Catholics that Protestants despise is "queen of heaven" but the scriptural basis for said title is literally found when she is given a crown of stars in Revelation 12:1.

Papal infallibility is one that is aggressively misunderstood. Infallibility only applies when a Pope is speaking Ex Cathedra which has happened exactly once.

Jesus HIMSELF says that the church has the authority to "bind and loose" in Matthew 16:19. Sins can be forgiven by the apostles. Would this not make them His vicars? Furthermore, even Protestants use the term "vicar" including Anglicans.

This is supposed to be a research board. Do better research.

3
redlotus69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Catholics worship the Pope not Jesus? Catholics are not Christian?

Boy I've been doing it wrong. Must have been fooled by the giant crucified Christ on the altar in my local cathedral. Who knew we weren't real Christians?

-1
redlotus69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

The Pope is literally just the bishop of Rome. Rome is the see in charge of all churches. The Byzantine Emperor Phocas even said this.

SOMEONE has to be the head of the church, in the book of Acts, Peter is clearly shown to be the head of the church. If there is no head of the church there is no agreement as seen by the thousands of protestant schisms.

-1
redlotus69 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Was Paul a pastor/elder?

He was celibate and unmarried... Last time I checked Jesus wasn't married either. Is He qualified to be a teacher/elder?

The Pope is literally just the bishop of Rome. Bishops exist in Scripture with Peter himself serving as the traditional "first Pope".

2
redlotus69 2 points ago +3 / -1

Washington set a 2 term precedent for a damn reason. He did not want legal kings.

The American people also elected FDR four times.

10
redlotus69 10 points ago +10 / -0

Friday POTUS will be sending an important message via Twitter?

10
redlotus69 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yep, lots of attention on judges right now.

My guess is that once Obama is revealed to have been illegitimate most of these Soros judges will go bye bye like that

8
redlotus69 8 points ago +8 / -0

Right now we are in the declass phase. Getting people angry enough to demand action. Epstein is a small fish, the release of those files will lead to a flood.

Arrests come next.

1
redlotus69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Typewriters are not computer keyboards. It's a completely different mechanism especially since they have to be manually reset for each line. Hand a kid a typewriter and they will have a hell of a time

2
redlotus69 2 points ago +2 / -0

"That comment is straight out of pharma's playbook."

No, it's a fact. We can't blame people being dumber because everyone isn't taught cursive anymore. The reason cursive isn't being taught is because it's largely irrelevant. Cursive was invented to write quickly and efficiently, since all communications are electronic now, cursive is obsolete. You don't see people being taught how to use typewriters, telegrams or fax in school for the same reason. Even paper checks are slowly starting to become obsolete!

Once again, I'm very much in favor of cursive being taught. But let's pump the brakes on the pearl clutching regarding cursive being essential to creative and unique children.

view more: Next ›