It's definitely someone on the inside track, their account was made even before nunes or trump. If nothing else this means what they say is interesting enough to warrant attention, and from there it's just conjecture and analysis about meanings etc.
maybe we should stop idolizing the persona of Q and be a little more broad in scope. it's not as if they've come out and indicated that they are the original Q, maybe Q is less of a person and more of a position or title, the person relating the info in the peculiar way we are accustomed to. if it is indeed a different person, performing the same duty that could also explain the platform change.
I don't think it's the same Q. I don't know if that is important.
maybe, i dunno if it matters..
It's definitely someone on the inside track, their account was made even before nunes or trump. If nothing else this means what they say is interesting enough to warrant attention, and from there it's just conjecture and analysis about meanings etc.
maybe we should stop idolizing the persona of Q and be a little more broad in scope. it's not as if they've come out and indicated that they are the original Q, maybe Q is less of a person and more of a position or title, the person relating the info in the peculiar way we are accustomed to. if it is indeed a different person, performing the same duty that could also explain the platform change.
I don't think it's the same Q. I don't know if that is important.