And Kash Patel specifically quoting @q with a photo of "Q" and then the Q account responded with a photo of the same scene but from Q perspective of Kash
You would think,if they screened everyone (as it seems they must be doing with the time it is taking) before letting new people on, then they would block someone who is Not Q, from using the Q name as I’m sure they know who Q is. Correct me if this is not clear thinking.
Platform was set. 8kun is the last platform we had drops on. I would appreciate if we could at least get a verifiable handshake between 8kun Q and TSQ.
Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
It appears to me that you are reading far to much into what I said. Also you are claiming multiple things about my post that just are not there. And finally you are pretending I'm talking about you when I'm obviously not.
Last I checked you have been on GAW longer than I have. Please don't lump yourself into the new eyes group just to feign you have been slighted by me. Listen, it's not my problem if I start talking about new eyes and you decide you want to suddenly self categorize that to mean you so you can suggest I'm calling you out as a know nothing. I don't know where you are hearing that messaging when you read my posts, but it's not coming from me.
Maybe you thought something else I said was disparaging or applying peer pressure to shut down other people thinking for or investigating for themselves. You will have to be more specific, I'm not seeing it.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
I look for the account to only be a mechanism to publicly avow the Q as legit. We may never know who the Q team is but Q+ I imagine will be confirmed at some point. At this point though there is substantial circumstantial evidence the Truth Social has something planned with this @Q account.
We have the @Q TSQ account created before DJT's or Nunes. Clearly someone at TS' dev team did it, and if they didn't, then they can figure out who did, identify it as a troll account and whack it.
But they have not.
Since only select individuals/influencers were invited to the closed beta, it doesn't make sense for someone to make the account with the express intent of giving Apple an excuse to nuke the app in the App Store.
I thought about that, why would they allow the supposed Q if it were not part of the plan? Also Nunes asking the question and calling attention to it. Yeah, for me this tips it in the direction of probable at this point. Plus the delta Q 4 years of "it's time to go public".
Unless the account is not meant as comms to Anons... which is also a possibility... but I'm waiting it out just the same, time and caution cost me nothing. I can catch up/read back later.
I hears ya, but from the start we had a no outside comms and trip codes. Now if Q posts on full chan confirming, then we have a thing. Could a dev level shill been injected, it's all just a guess I guess.
Seeing as the new Q had a RESERVED account before literally anyone- including Trump- it might be safe to assume that this is the real McCoy, or a sting to catch hackers/ doxers at least.
Is this even outside coms? It's the Q team's platform after all. Making a public appearance.
If the account survives for some time, that will confirm it's genuine. The fact that the account was created BEFORE Nunez and DJT's accounts is remarkable in itself.
we don't know that Q was a 'he' , less than 10. You're preferred pronoun (as much as I generally despise that BS) would be 'they'. And don't be certain this is the real deal, as so many have mentioned: no outside coms.
I tend to agree. Research/Baking/News/historical events/digs... This Anon is still gonna do what I do and when/if Q wants us... I'll be ops normal til it comes through loud and clear.
This would mean that Truth Social is a honeypot/ glowie site, Trump is the enemy and Nunes is his lackey. Caution is a wise procedure but that doesn't mean you should turn off your brain.
exactly it's all about confusing the enemy and making us 'discern', figure it out on our own.
Feb 15, 2018 3:47:34 PM EST
Q !UW.yye1fxo
388528
Why is Big Pharma essential?
Expand your thinking past cures.
Think Google [new Pixel phone].
Think Apple [vs. Samsung].
Why was Blackberry destroyed?
We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH.
THEY are watching.
ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.
Q
So Trump is the enemy? Apologies if I don't go there.
Take it a step further. What comms are at risk now? This is a NEWS site, same as Truth Social is.
Even deeper, there is nothing that the babylonians would love to see more, right now, than a bunch of anons shooting up their neighborhoods. If this q announces tora, tora, tora, than yeah, you have a good point. But they are telling us to remain calm, they got it. EXACTLY the same message that q has been saying all along. Which is what we should expect.
I don't think you understand. What comms are they going to drop now? They've already given us all we need. They said this many times. Our last orders were to "enjoy the show." Which is what we are doing right now. The "plan" is in action. What a better way to establish the legitimacy of Trump and Q by doing exactly what they are doing right now, with their work on Truth Social? They are pointing back at themselves so that we know it is for real and what to expect (see all the original drops.)
Our job now, with the solid counter narrative platforms that they have given us, is to be the REAL news, not the FAKE news. Why are we discrediting ourselves?
i don't think you understand. I am not saying there are any comms coming and I agree we have more than we know and to enjoy the show.
I am saying that people are not listening to what has been said in previous drops. Q only posts in the boards. I am also saying that someone could have created that account to cause confusion or is a distraction.
I am in absolutely no way saying that the Q on Truth Social is the Q team that has posted drops on the boards in the past.
I am in absolutely no way saying that the Q on Truth Social is the Q team that has posted drops on the boards in the past.
Then we, for sure, do not misunderstand each other.
What I'm saying is that you are overlooking the fact that Trump "owns" Truth Social, the account created date proofs, the username proofs, the 3 year deltas, the call out of Chernobyl being an objective, it's not starting to pile up for you?
It wouldn't mean that anymore than it would mean some site administrator named Quincy was testing the account creation process early on and didn't feel like typing his whole name. Who knows what it is. Until Trump or original Q weigh in on it I'm occupied by more important things.
I'm in monitor & control mode regarding TS-Q. The coincidences and technicalities associated with TS-Q are sure interesting. The content of the posts is decidedly different than original Q. I'm waiting to see either a confirmation on 8kun or something so unbelievably profound from TS-Q in the form of a proof before I move my confidence to 95%. I'm just above 50/50 at the moment.
If Q wanted to prove he’s the legit Q from 8chan he could post on truth the password that gives the Q trip code on 8chan. Then anyone could verify the account is real.
It's definitely someone on the inside track, their account was made even before nunes or trump. If nothing else this means what they say is interesting enough to warrant attention, and from there it's just conjecture and analysis about meanings etc.
maybe we should stop idolizing the persona of Q and be a little more broad in scope. it's not as if they've come out and indicated that they are the original Q, maybe Q is less of a person and more of a position or title, the person relating the info in the peculiar way we are accustomed to. if it is indeed a different person, performing the same duty that could also explain the platform change.
I don't think it's the same Q. I don't know if that is important.
Sounds wise to me. This new, much more public, version could be setting up for false flags galore. Be careful who you follow.
No outside comms. Outside of what? The chans? I'm a bit dubious is all, gonna need solid proofs before I get on board.
this right here ^^^
until i hear otherwise its business as usual. 8kun is still up.
Why not call him "Q2", or "Q?"
Something easy like when Q+ was used.
Like QT, or Qt?
Qt looks an awful lot like Q+
TWQ.
Q Twq - The Habbening
Summer 2Q22
Lets call him THIQQ
Correct.
Right now I'm leaning towards legit Q. With the Chernobyl coincidence and Devin replying to @Q plus the less than 3 character user account name.
And Kash Patel specifically quoting @q with a photo of "Q" and then the Q account responded with a photo of the same scene but from Q perspective of Kash
Indeed. Whoever it is, is connected to the patriots.
Username checks out
Q's last board was 8 Kun.
drop 465 "No other platforms used." drop 475 "NO COMMS outside of this platform." drop 513 "NO COMMS made outside of this platform."
Seems rather clear to me Q was referring to the platform he was posting on.
They don’t understand why
Just like with telegram or Austin stienbart on Twitter people will fall for it
If things have double meaning it could also mean that Q will return to a public forum. Also ties in with future proves past. Just speculations.
Is Chans short for Channels?
No, 4chan, 8chan, those message boards were Q used to post.
Yes
NO TRIP NOT Q
You would think,if they screened everyone (as it seems they must be doing with the time it is taking) before letting new people on, then they would block someone who is Not Q, from using the Q name as I’m sure they know who Q is. Correct me if this is not clear thinking.
And @Q would have been deleted by now by the CE-fkn-O
Is there a character limit?
Betting on Flynn
I'm going to go with no outside comms for now.
Platform was set. 8kun is the last platform we had drops on. I would appreciate if we could at least get a verifiable handshake between 8kun Q and TSQ.
Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
It appears to me that you are reading far to much into what I said. Also you are claiming multiple things about my post that just are not there. And finally you are pretending I'm talking about you when I'm obviously not.
Last I checked you have been on GAW longer than I have. Please don't lump yourself into the new eyes group just to feign you have been slighted by me. Listen, it's not my problem if I start talking about new eyes and you decide you want to suddenly self categorize that to mean you so you can suggest I'm calling you out as a know nothing. I don't know where you are hearing that messaging when you read my posts, but it's not coming from me.
Maybe you thought something else I said was disparaging or applying peer pressure to shut down other people thinking for or investigating for themselves. You will have to be more specific, I'm not seeing it.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
Poor reading comprehension unfortunately
It didn't come across that way, some people have to much pride and like to argue.
I look for the account to only be a mechanism to publicly avow the Q as legit. We may never know who the Q team is but Q+ I imagine will be confirmed at some point. At this point though there is substantial circumstantial evidence the Truth Social has something planned with this @Q account.
Well... that would be actually very Q-like.
Haven't people requested proof from Q and he/they delivered in some kind of way?
That would be the ultimate Q proof for me.
And I think we are in a time, where "ultimate" is quite a suitable adjective. :-D
Baited to remove them from the apple store.
We have the @Q TSQ account created before DJT's or Nunes. Clearly someone at TS' dev team did it, and if they didn't, then they can figure out who did, identify it as a troll account and whack it.
But they have not.
Since only select individuals/influencers were invited to the closed beta, it doesn't make sense for someone to make the account with the express intent of giving Apple an excuse to nuke the app in the App Store.
I thought about that, why would they allow the supposed Q if it were not part of the plan? Also Nunes asking the question and calling attention to it. Yeah, for me this tips it in the direction of probable at this point. Plus the delta Q 4 years of "it's time to go public".
Apple will remove TS from it's store, then the Android version comes out, then "the storm is upon us" hopefully, or something like that.
You make sense! I could not have thought of that.
apples always saying they value privacy, and claim all their anti-consumer lockdown is to protect your privacy.
No fren, we really have to have a tripcode first before any trusted comms.
Ok yes my mistake then if that's what you meant to differentiate. My bad anon.
Unless the account is not meant as comms to Anons... which is also a possibility... but I'm waiting it out just the same, time and caution cost me nothing. I can catch up/read back later.
It could be meant as a steadier, to keep people from worrying I suppose. Like you I'll keep my powder dry at the mo.
What about the fake Q post that was sent out last year on Patriots fight board or some shit?
The one that triggered all the Q alerts apps.
That proved that Q's trip code was compromised or 8kun was hacked.
The way to reconfirm Q is for Trump to acknowledge via a coincidence.
Wasn't a fake Q. It was a false alarm.
hey you down there... stop copypasting your response to everything on here.
I hears ya, but from the start we had a no outside comms and trip codes. Now if Q posts on full chan confirming, then we have a thing. Could a dev level shill been injected, it's all just a guess I guess.
Moar popcorn!
Seeing as the new Q had a RESERVED account before literally anyone- including Trump- it might be safe to assume that this is the real McCoy, or a sting to catch hackers/ doxers at least.
Is this even outside coms? It's the Q team's platform after all. Making a public appearance.
I like "NewQ" personally rather than TSQ.
I prfer TSQ
sounds good!
original and extra crispy, b/c what comes next will be hot
If the account survives for some time, that will confirm it's genuine. The fact that the account was created BEFORE Nunez and DJT's accounts is remarkable in itself.
They could remove it quickly if they wanted to. They would have by now.
Genuine what though? It surviving only confirms the TS team is fine with it existing, not what it actually is.
Well they might let it go knowing a large portion of the base studies Q drops. It would make their new truth social a hit.
I dont know that it is or isn't but it's easy to see them using it for marketing
He said he was coming back. Looks like TS is how he will do it.
we don't know that Q was a 'he' , less than 10. You're preferred pronoun (as much as I generally despise that BS) would be 'they'. And don't be certain this is the real deal, as so many have mentioned: no outside coms.
I think @q is neater tbh
Wise.
call him @Q
Seems totally reasonable.
Q said no outside comms. I think we should not let the Q on Truth distract us.
I tend to agree. Research/Baking/News/historical events/digs... This Anon is still gonna do what I do and when/if Q wants us... I'll be ops normal til it comes through loud and clear.
Id say yes. Maybe permanent sticky a thread that gets updated in the op with new drops.
Until further notice
👍
Easy @Q
Perhaps we can refer to truthsocial Q as R
Sköl
This would mean that Truth Social is a honeypot/ glowie site, Trump is the enemy and Nunes is his lackey. Caution is a wise procedure but that doesn't mean you should turn off your brain.
or it's planned. cause confusion, etc. if we knew what was going on the enemy would definitely know what was going on.
exactly it's all about confusing the enemy and making us 'discern', figure it out on our own.
Feb 15, 2018 3:47:34 PM EST Q !UW.yye1fxo 388528 Why is Big Pharma essential? Expand your thinking past cures. Think Google [new Pixel phone]. Think Apple [vs. Samsung]. Why was Blackberry destroyed? We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH. THEY are watching. ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE. Q
So Trump is the enemy? Apologies if I don't go there.
Take it a step further. What comms are at risk now? This is a NEWS site, same as Truth Social is.
Even deeper, there is nothing that the babylonians would love to see more, right now, than a bunch of anons shooting up their neighborhoods. If this q announces tora, tora, tora, than yeah, you have a good point. But they are telling us to remain calm, they got it. EXACTLY the same message that q has been saying all along. Which is what we should expect.
https://youtu.be/_WJ6FbcWYRU
I'm referring to the Q/TSQ confusion.
I don't think you understand. What comms are they going to drop now? They've already given us all we need. They said this many times. Our last orders were to "enjoy the show." Which is what we are doing right now. The "plan" is in action. What a better way to establish the legitimacy of Trump and Q by doing exactly what they are doing right now, with their work on Truth Social? They are pointing back at themselves so that we know it is for real and what to expect (see all the original drops.)
Our job now, with the solid counter narrative platforms that they have given us, is to be the REAL news, not the FAKE news. Why are we discrediting ourselves?
i don't think you understand. I am not saying there are any comms coming and I agree we have more than we know and to enjoy the show.
I am saying that people are not listening to what has been said in previous drops. Q only posts in the boards. I am also saying that someone could have created that account to cause confusion or is a distraction.
I am in absolutely no way saying that the Q on Truth Social is the Q team that has posted drops on the boards in the past.
I hope this clears up what I was referring to.
I am in absolutely no way saying that the Q on Truth Social is the Q team that has posted drops on the boards in the past.
Then we, for sure, do not misunderstand each other.
What I'm saying is that you are overlooking the fact that Trump "owns" Truth Social, the account created date proofs, the username proofs, the 3 year deltas, the call out of Chernobyl being an objective, it's not starting to pile up for you?
Question, do you still trust the chans?
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
It wouldn't mean that anymore than it would mean some site administrator named Quincy was testing the account creation process early on and didn't feel like typing his whole name. Who knows what it is. Until Trump or original Q weigh in on it I'm occupied by more important things.
@Q
Just my opinion that it's fake, could be real, kinda doubt it.
truth social q, and assume is fake until proven otherwise
Can't not read that as, "Trans Sexual Q" haaa
I like OGQ myself for pre TS posts.
The truth social Q is just a dude until proven otherwise. Just like ANYTHING, read the posts and do your own research.
Yes. I just think of this one as Truth Q
@q gets my vote
[at kyu]
I'm in monitor & control mode regarding TS-Q. The coincidences and technicalities associated with TS-Q are sure interesting. The content of the posts is decidedly different than original Q. I'm waiting to see either a confirmation on 8kun or something so unbelievably profound from TS-Q in the form of a proof before I move my confidence to 95%. I'm just above 50/50 at the moment.
Great idea.
No. Because no one has ever lied on the internet.
If Q wanted to prove he’s the legit Q from 8chan he could post on truth the password that gives the Q trip code on 8chan. Then anyone could verify the account is real.
Maybe Q+ isn’t djt after all, but rather the + sign was meant to be a T. Qtruth
maybe, i dunno if it matters..
It's definitely someone on the inside track, their account was made even before nunes or trump. If nothing else this means what they say is interesting enough to warrant attention, and from there it's just conjecture and analysis about meanings etc.
maybe we should stop idolizing the persona of Q and be a little more broad in scope. it's not as if they've come out and indicated that they are the original Q, maybe Q is less of a person and more of a position or title, the person relating the info in the peculiar way we are accustomed to. if it is indeed a different person, performing the same duty that could also explain the platform change.
I don't think it's the same Q. I don't know if that is important.
Absolutley. And mods should enforce it too imo. If it doesnt say @Q or better yet TSQ it should get flaired
so much for exhaustive research
if there was a trip code on 8kun stating something that proved it was Q I would be onboard. until then? meh