I don't claim to know much about history. I basically just know from the last few years that I do not trust the government or media. Can someone explain why NATO sucks, in actual educated terms?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Basically, a bunch of little countries who can't afford armies or otherwise protect themselves, join an organization that promises "world peace" by offering protection from larger countries. Imagine a mafia protection-racket in a city like New York or Chicago. They pay a certain amount of dues, and are guaranteed the protection of the umbrella. It originally grew out of the League of Nations, which was a failure.
But they also have to concede military and banking controls, and other wealthy influencers (like the Clinton Foundation, WEF, etc.) access into their systems for laundering money, and furthering more corruption. "Here's $100 million dollars we got from a grant from tax-dollars from so-and-so country. We'll give it to you for your LGBTQ+ and gender studies programs, as long as you make a donation of $20 million to our foundation." That kind of garbage.
In short, it's a disease under the auspices of world peace, but in fact funnels more dollars to the uber-rich who own everything around the world, including the central banks, media, justice departments, and pharmaceutical companies. It also allows bankers to grow their own private army. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/15/un-backed-troops-accused-rape-congo