Yes and no. Basically, the RINO faggots and cowardly GOP are trying to protect themselves, even if it means handing seats to the left. It's a strategy called defensive gerrymandering. Texas is the most brazen example of the strategy this session. They basically locked down every existing seat using gerrymandering based on "current and projected data" Meaning they'll hold their exact majority for the next 10 years if nothing out of the ordinary happens.
That being said, the corrupt courts are a problem as well, as mentioned in the article with Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. But from my understanding all three states are fighting the courts decisions, North Carolina in particular has a REALLY good case given that they're no longer under the ridiculous judicial preview that all southern states were under until the last few years in regards to election laws and gerrymandering. So worst case scenario, the old maps are used this year.
Regardless, I wouldn't worry about it. The Virginia Project and Virginia election last year proved that the local precinct strategy works bigly, given it caused a 35% swing to the right in Virginia despite cheating. This is even more encouraging when you consider that the GOP took over the Virginia house and senate as well, where in a lot of cases the seats they won were in D+15 or greater districts based on "official data".
This is the strategy we're using on a nationwide basis now. The Virginia project has shared their methodology and has been holding meetings and training sessions in every state in the union and major metro area in the country. It's more appropriate to call it the American or Patriot project now in all honesty.
We're in a situation where the left is losing more and more support permanently on a daily basis. I don't mean these stupid people who never learn either. People are finally waking up and while they may not be joining the Q party exactly, they're realizing the error of their ways and becoming proactive in their new conservative beliefs.
Combine the precinct strategy with constantly accelerating loss of support, the left losing its ability to cheat like they're used to, and all of the other social and economic factors, and it doesn't matter HOW any state gerrymanders. A district could be D+30 and they're still VERY likely to lose this fall because of all of these factors combined.
Look at Texas, several of the D+15 districts they've drawn up as "safely democrat" are in the Rio Grande Valley. This is despite the fact that this entire region is voting more and more conservative every election, and in every local and county election since 2020, the GOP candidate has won in the area for the first time 50-80 years depending on what county/town/city you're referring to.
So just because a district is labeled as heavily democrat, doesn't mean it's true. In fact, it's likely NOT true and only perceived as such because the "data" reflects decades of gradually increasing election fraud.
This write up is great! While I wish I could have figured this out it's great that ppl like u actually take the time to explain some stuff to retarded apes like me. Like I want to fight the good fight but I don't have time to get into the nitty gritty of everything so knowledge sharing like this is awesome!
::(I) Request the Commissioner of Education to appoint a131 special magistrate who is a member of The Florida Bar in good132 standing and who has at least 5 years' experience in133 administrative law. The special magistrate shall determine facts134 relating to the dispute over the school district procedure or135 practice, consider information provided by the school district,136 and render a recommended decision for resolution to the State137 Board of Education within 30 days after receipt of the request138 by the parent. The State Board of Education must approve or139 reject the recommended decision at its next regularly scheduled140 meeting that is more than 7 calendar days and no more than 30141 days after the date the recommended decision is transmitted. The142 costs of the special magistrate shall be borne by the school143 district. The State Board of Education shall adopt rules,144 including forms, necessary to implement this subparagraph.
Who pays the district? Tax payer? All they need to do is say something happened, they could even do a whole fake court mock up. How many would immediately rush to demand recourse? School district has to pay for everything involving gathering the evidence. Who would have to pay if someone was found negligible? Parents could sue the school? Who pays the school? Tax payer? The parents would be suing themselves!
EVERY FUCKING TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who benefits from this the most? Florida Bar? Lawyers?
Where would the money won go?
Remove the legislation
This is from the "don't say gay bill" which was supposed to be awesome. This is how they operate. They are not on our side. We are nothing more than money to them and their friends.
More anaons needed here. I'm pro flirida but is red state over reacting?
Yes and no. Basically, the RINO faggots and cowardly GOP are trying to protect themselves, even if it means handing seats to the left. It's a strategy called defensive gerrymandering. Texas is the most brazen example of the strategy this session. They basically locked down every existing seat using gerrymandering based on "current and projected data" Meaning they'll hold their exact majority for the next 10 years if nothing out of the ordinary happens.
That being said, the corrupt courts are a problem as well, as mentioned in the article with Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. But from my understanding all three states are fighting the courts decisions, North Carolina in particular has a REALLY good case given that they're no longer under the ridiculous judicial preview that all southern states were under until the last few years in regards to election laws and gerrymandering. So worst case scenario, the old maps are used this year.
Regardless, I wouldn't worry about it. The Virginia Project and Virginia election last year proved that the local precinct strategy works bigly, given it caused a 35% swing to the right in Virginia despite cheating. This is even more encouraging when you consider that the GOP took over the Virginia house and senate as well, where in a lot of cases the seats they won were in D+15 or greater districts based on "official data".
This is the strategy we're using on a nationwide basis now. The Virginia project has shared their methodology and has been holding meetings and training sessions in every state in the union and major metro area in the country. It's more appropriate to call it the American or Patriot project now in all honesty.
We're in a situation where the left is losing more and more support permanently on a daily basis. I don't mean these stupid people who never learn either. People are finally waking up and while they may not be joining the Q party exactly, they're realizing the error of their ways and becoming proactive in their new conservative beliefs.
Combine the precinct strategy with constantly accelerating loss of support, the left losing its ability to cheat like they're used to, and all of the other social and economic factors, and it doesn't matter HOW any state gerrymanders. A district could be D+30 and they're still VERY likely to lose this fall because of all of these factors combined.
Look at Texas, several of the D+15 districts they've drawn up as "safely democrat" are in the Rio Grande Valley. This is despite the fact that this entire region is voting more and more conservative every election, and in every local and county election since 2020, the GOP candidate has won in the area for the first time 50-80 years depending on what county/town/city you're referring to.
So just because a district is labeled as heavily democrat, doesn't mean it's true. In fact, it's likely NOT true and only perceived as such because the "data" reflects decades of gradually increasing election fraud.
This write up is great! While I wish I could have figured this out it's great that ppl like u actually take the time to explain some stuff to retarded apes like me. Like I want to fight the good fight but I don't have time to get into the nitty gritty of everything so knowledge sharing like this is awesome!
Color revolution.
That side bad, this side good.....?
Both sides bad?
From recent legislation passed by Desantis;
Wolf in sheep's clothes!
::(I) Request the Commissioner of Education to appoint a131 special magistrate who is a member of The Florida Bar in good132 standing and who has at least 5 years' experience in133 administrative law. The special magistrate shall determine facts134 relating to the dispute over the school district procedure or135 practice, consider information provided by the school district,136 and render a recommended decision for resolution to the State137 Board of Education within 30 days after receipt of the request138 by the parent. The State Board of Education must approve or139 reject the recommended decision at its next regularly scheduled140 meeting that is more than 7 calendar days and no more than 30141 days after the date the recommended decision is transmitted. The142 costs of the special magistrate shall be borne by the school143 district. The State Board of Education shall adopt rules,144 including forms, necessary to implement this subparagraph.
Who pays the district? Tax payer? All they need to do is say something happened, they could even do a whole fake court mock up. How many would immediately rush to demand recourse? School district has to pay for everything involving gathering the evidence. Who would have to pay if someone was found negligible? Parents could sue the school? Who pays the school? Tax payer? The parents would be suing themselves!
EVERY FUCKING TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who benefits from this the most? Florida Bar? Lawyers?
Where would the money won go?
Remove the legislation
This is from the "don't say gay bill" which was supposed to be awesome. This is how they operate. They are not on our side. We are nothing more than money to them and their friends.