The Super Bowl Was Just One Giant Comm For the Ukraine War And The Coming Soon Taiwan One
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Lol.
"But... but muh coincidence! Nothing to see here people!"
I bet you cry the same for Q proofs and Deltas. "Trump j-just happen to make that typo and fix it 17 seconds later! Coincidence!"
Also the 22 is not referring to 2/22 but to the day 22. I thought that obvious.
"Stop over interpreting stuff"
Why cause it hurts your feelings? If you don't like people decoding than you can do what any sane and rational personal would do and just ignore it. You are deliberating going out of your way to complain that you don't like people decoding.
I'm sorry if it bothers your fee-fees but that's your problem. You've given not rational argument why people shouldn't do it, it's just you crying don't like it because you don't agree with it.
"Muh feelings!"
I don't care about your feelings.
Riiiight. I think you're just being willfully blind. You can obviously see what you're pointing out, but want to pick a fight.
You sound like a the guilty party sitting before a jury and crying, "So what if I just happened to have the murder weapon and I just happened to be in the area and I just happened to have a life insurance policy on the deceased and I just happened to purchase the murder weapon! You people need to stop READING things into it! It's all a coincidence! One giant coincidence! You people are dumber than the police who arrested me! Ugh!"
I think you need to go back read Q posts. Specially the part about when do things become mathematically impossible. And also look into circumstantial evidence. The world doesn't operate like Columbo show. The villains don't conveniently confess because they were tricked into thinking they were caught. Most proof of something figured out by logical analysis and circumstances too great to be a coincidence.
In fact, people usually just based on circumstantial evidence (coincidences too great to be random). Cases almost never have absolute proof of something. That's just a fantasy of TV shows like CSI and crime dramas where the villain is always duped into confessing. Most of the time in trials the evidence is circumstantial and you prove to the jury that the coincidences are too great to be dismissed as random coincidence.
That's why it's important to think logically.
no, i don't, you're just assuming that your "decodes" are on the same level as "girl next to trump holding flags in the position relation to the letter "Q" in naval signs" (or something like this)
they aren't, those are laughable, not real comms, just nitpicking from random posts from random jornalists.
Not at all. You're making a false equivalence.
Do you understand how circumstantial evidence works?
For example, in the movie "My Cousin Vinny" the MC's cousin is about to go jail for murder based on circumstantial evidence (coincidences so great to be impossible to happen by random chance). The MC is even laughed at by the prosecutor for trying to argue that all the insane coincidences that point to his cousin as the killer are in fact coincidence. He has to PROOF with hard evidence that they are coincidence because the circumstantial evidence is so damning.
If you are going to argue that what you even ADMITTED were insane level of coincidence are mere coincidence than the burden of proving that is on you. Go find some actual evidence. Right now all you have is your opinion and frankly you sound off your rocker.
You even admitted the absurd level of coincidence for the winning team to have the same colors as the Ukraine flag. Yet you want to insist it's just laughable. Which is absurd.
But if you want to insist against all logic in reason that it's all coincidence then you need to make an actual case for it. All you have is "my fee-fees".
At the end of the day if you don't like something because of your fee-fees you could do the rational thing and just look for different posts? Why are you even bothering to comment if you are are going to provide no proof for your argument?
You're literally just "I don't like this! REEEEE"
Then go elsewhere like any rational person would.
"But if you want to insist against all logic in reason that it's all coincidence then you need to make an actual case for it. All you have is "my fee-fees"."
I'm not saying its all coincidence, i'm saying most of THIS post is coincidence, also, most of it doesnt even link up, the leftmost session shouldn't even be included, it proves nothing, it comes from nothing, even the numbers you point out don't match.
every team has a Number 9 Player, 2/20 is NOT 2/22 no matter how much you want to be.
i'm not arguing with feelings, they have no place in any discussion, i'm arguing against your WEAK point, this isn't rational, you've gone too far into it and didn't care to reevaluate how good this post was before posting it.
i already said, the Colors/Names things is GOOD, but [9], 2/20 and SPECIALLY the 66% = 666 is NOT EVEN AN COINCIDENCE, IT'S NOTHING, ITS LITERALLY NOTHING, there's NOTHING there, "number = number so comms" isn't an argument, THE TEAMS THING IS FUCKING GOOD, the rest of it not so much.
Erm... Were you referring to the 22 I highlighted in Dan Scavino's tweet? I thought that's what you were referring to. I thought you were making a big deal over pointing out that he had the 22 on his shirt.
Have you ever read the decode blog? I think you don't understand where the 66 is coming from. For people more experienced with decodes they already know 66 is a shorthand of 666. I think perhaps if you're new to decodes you are misunderstanding where the comms are coming from. The more seasoned people get it.
I'd start here and learn the basics of comms before you dismiss:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/blog/
u/dty6 u/lonewulf
Do you know what I mean by the "66" is "666". You've learned enough comms to know that one right?
This commenter is is confused why I would say that:
Maybe you could help me explain what I'm basing that on. Sometimes I take for granted how well a lot of us have learned to read comms that I forget how it would look to people who are seeing it for the first time.
I see 6/2 and 2/6 and I know by this point what it means. We also get the 23. But I think for people seeing it for the first time it might be confusing. It would probably not make sense to people who have not learned any comms before. It's a lot to digest.
Have you ever read the Q posts about "Think Mirror" and "learn our comms". Q shows a picture of a palm tree and says "what does it mean?" Later people realize it's a "plant" and plant has the double meaning of a "spy". There are a whole bunch of Q posts about learning the comms and that double meaning exist. A lot of those lead to decodes. If you don't have a lot of knowledge of those deciphered Q decodes like "Baby hands on floor = Syria" and how that was deciphered you will be absolutely baffled by most decodes.
They are not random things. Many are known symbols. The most basic (ones Q actually taught) is plants = spy and water =info.