Not all the adverse events will be related to the vaccine, as a side effect is something they can relate with clinical evidence to the vaccine.
An adverse event is reported, but that doesn’t mean it’s related.
Some of the VAERs reported will be related to something else, or not related to the vaccine, so this is why it’s confusing.
Unless you believe absolutely everything that can happen to a person is related to one event and not the countless other events that can happen to a person.
For instance within a years time a person had time for an artery to become a 100 percent blocked requiring open heart surgery. This event took over 30 years but just happened to peak within a years time due to, of course some people will have this due to pure randomness.
This doesn’t mean the open heart surgery was related to a vaccine. Simply because we know it takes many years for an artery to clog.
They will look at it anyway as they want all adverse events reported. But in all likelihood a clogged artery, like a clogged pipe, developed over time. Unless the vaccine were known to enhance fat to be eaten at a higher rate. Fat clogging the arteries most likely was fat eaten over a lifetime and not fat eaten over 9 months.
Safety Trial Data is used to verify/confirm VAERS Data... comparison. If an adverse event is suspected it, by law, has to be reported. You make a reasonable point that not all Adverse Events are related to the mRNA jabs per VAERS. But in clinical trials, safety, they are compared against placebo, ruling out potential adverse events that are not associated with the mRNA jabs. VAERS in highly underreported, but is still used as a baseline to monitor safety in medications. Over time, long term safety trials will either confirm what VAERES indicates or not. Again, Safety trials compare against Placebo (non drug) which is then compared to safety trials.
Also VAERs is an adverse event listing system.
Not all the adverse events will be related to the vaccine, as a side effect is something they can relate with clinical evidence to the vaccine.
An adverse event is reported, but that doesn’t mean it’s related.
Some of the VAERs reported will be related to something else, or not related to the vaccine, so this is why it’s confusing.
Unless you believe absolutely everything that can happen to a person is related to one event and not the countless other events that can happen to a person.
For instance within a years time a person had time for an artery to become a 100 percent blocked requiring open heart surgery. This event took over 30 years but just happened to peak within a years time due to, of course some people will have this due to pure randomness.
This doesn’t mean the open heart surgery was related to a vaccine. Simply because we know it takes many years for an artery to clog.
They will look at it anyway as they want all adverse events reported. But in all likelihood a clogged artery, like a clogged pipe, developed over time. Unless the vaccine were known to enhance fat to be eaten at a higher rate. Fat clogging the arteries most likely was fat eaten over a lifetime and not fat eaten over 9 months.
Safety Trial Data is used to verify/confirm VAERS Data... comparison. If an adverse event is suspected it, by law, has to be reported. You make a reasonable point that not all Adverse Events are related to the mRNA jabs per VAERS. But in clinical trials, safety, they are compared against placebo, ruling out potential adverse events that are not associated with the mRNA jabs. VAERS in highly underreported, but is still used as a baseline to monitor safety in medications. Over time, long term safety trials will either confirm what VAERES indicates or not. Again, Safety trials compare against Placebo (non drug) which is then compared to safety trials.
Good luck! I tried telling this to the board a while back and was told by the mods to stop.