Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30: full pages of known adverse effects…
(twitter.com)
💉VACCINE DATA RELEASE 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (209)
sorted by:
The data in the report is verified and cross referenced for duplicates. The only time it is investigated is when an usual amount of reports surface for myocardia or deaths as a example.
It has not in the past or now flooded by garbage information.
Just the deaths have exceeded all vaccines for the past 30 years for Covid. That is a huge red flag. The CDC and the FDA have ignored and done zero investigations.
The last time the CDC and CDC did there job was the swine flu vaccine, With data on less than 35 deaths the FDA investigated and pulled the vaccine from the marketplace. In the end we lost 52 people from the vaccine before it was over.
It is not a police hot line from your comments. That comment is from ignorance. Data is input with the knowledge that jail time and fines for a fraudulent report. Johns Hopkins states that we capture only about 10 to 20 percent of adverse events. It serves as canary in the cold mine.
The data base is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of health problems (also called “adverse events”) that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.
We have a huge amount of data on other vaccines and it is easy to predict in a sub group of people the number of deaths, heart attacks and other medical issues will occur from any vaccine.
The other and only accurate source is autopsies. Only about 25% of the population end up in a autopsy that is not requested by law enforcement. We have at 61 cases of direct lengths to the vaccine.
Enough to immediately remove the vaccine form the marketplace if anyone was listening. The entire effort is the cover used to make this part of the New World Government
You might need to be clearer what you mean here. The data has been verified that an adverse event took place in some cases, sure. That doesn't mean that the adverse events following some time after vaccination are verified as reactions TO the vaccination. And that's really the number that is important for separating garbage baseline from clinically-significant cases. That can't be done using a database that merely collects information on adverse reactions; such a database is Step 1 in the process of verifying these as actual vaccine reactions.
This is not verifiable using an adverse event reporting system. What you're seeing is deaths reported to the system. You are not seeing what percentage, IF ANY, are due to the vaccine.
It's not surprising to see a huge number of deaths in such a system. You're giving a vaccine to an enormous number of people with an enormous number of pre-existing pathways towards death that have nothing to do with the vaccine. The numbers of deaths in a system like this aren't indicative of anything except the number of people that we're tracking.
Swine flu never became a pandemic, so risk calculus changes significantly under those conditions when compared to COVID, which is considered far greater a threat to the average person than swine flu was. The number of cases of GBS that MAY (but still haven't been proven) to be linked to that vaccine would not have been considered problematic if swine flu had been responsible for as many deaths and injuries as COVID has been blamed for.
That's a fundamental problem in our sides discussing this. We're operating under different risk assessments. A very rare side effect isn't a huge problem to someone who believes COVID to be a serious and prevalent threat. If you think that COVID and the vaccine are a hoax or some sort of Deep State op, then ANY side effect would be considered to be too much.
The swine flu vaccine was considered at the time to carry too high a risk in relation to the non-pandemic threat presented by the swine flu. The variables in COVID have different values and therefore a different consideration weight of clinical significance.
Reports don't have to be fraudulent, they just have to be wrong. Doctors have to submit EVERY medical issue that happens after a vaccine, and can legitimately submit a report that their hair changed color after vaccination if their hair actually did change color after vaccination. Even if it just turned gray and the vaccinated individual is 40. That's not fraud. It's just wrong.
So even if the vaccine was a PLACEBO, you'd still see a huge number of reports in a system like this. And people who misinterpret that data would think that the placebo was killing people in droves.
This is probably true. The reason it shocks you is because you, like most people here, are confusing the medical research terms of "adverse event" and "vaccine reaction." Vaccine reactions are adverse events, but they could also be only .00001% of adverse events.
Johns Hopkins and VAERS would prefer we know EVERY adverse event, which means that we want to know literally every fucking thing that goes wrong with you for a month after you've been vaccinated.
If you get vaccinated, and then a week later one of your toes hurts a little for a couple of hours, then that's an adverse event that Johns Hopkins wants to know about. If you don't tell them, then congrats, you're part of the 90% of lost data on adverse events they're talking about.
I appreciate the thought you put into this post.
I could care less about politics. People are ignorant because of political leanings and not looking for truth.
VAERS has been around since 1990. It is serves only as a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines. It is the preverbal canary in the coal mine.
There is several other database for all approves FDA drugs that is maintained and is not public accessible. In these databases we have adequate data that we can set parameters on when the alarm bell rings the FDA becomes aware. It acts like the check engine light on your car. It is a cost effective way to tract vaccine adverse reactions for possible issues without having to investigate every incident.
Our medical profession has failed us. Hospitals, Doctors and Hospital Administrators have instructed that no one file any incident reports. Most of the vaccinations given were at drive thru locations, work locations and by pharmacists. Most if not all of them never see the patient again. Most if not all do not even know the VAERS system.
CDC instructed everyone not to report an adverse reaction until after 14 days had elapsed after the injection. So if you were sitting in your local RX and collapsed after the shot it would not be recorded at all.
It takes about 40 minutes and under the threat of jail time and fines for false reports. The Johns Hopkins study was under reporting by that factor. Once the data is in the system it is checked to make sure it is not a duplicate. It is also checked for data accuracy.
If the system finds the number of reports for a particular adverse reaction exceeds a bench mark then the CDC and FDA investigate. (Canary Dies) Here is the issue that should scare the hell out of everyone. The FDA and CDC are not investigating any adverse reactions unless it shows up in media. They are more in practicing political science. They have 2 masters to please. About 60 per cent of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry itself. Another 30% comes from the US taxpayers and they make money on their own.
The makeup of the drug approval panel contains more than half of the people who worked for Pfizer at some point. It took over a decade for the FDA to warn about the new at that time narcotics like Vicodin, Oxycodone. It was not until the public was made aware of the 100,000 overdoses.
Throughout the pandemic all good science was jettisoned for political purposes.