Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30: full pages of known adverse effects…
(twitter.com)
💉VACCINE DATA RELEASE 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (209)
sorted by:
Then I'm not... sure... we disagree...
VAERS is useful tool. It's a necessary part of the investigative system, and I absolutely want it doing exactly what it's doing and being used by researchers to keep an eye on any unusual trends. It's the first step.
It is impossible to establish any sort of argument that proves the vaccine caused even a single case of injury. You can't just slap down a spreadsheet of VAERS numbers and say that a smart person can look at that data and see that the vaccine is PROVEN to be a problem.
Which is something a lot of people here disagree with.
If you do not, then I apologize. I am managing multiple conversations tonight and may have made an unfounded assumption about your stance on this when performing the mental heuristics I sometimes need to multitask here. :)
100 percent agree, VAERS is not fact/truth, it is merely data that needs to be compared to against clinical safety trial data to find commonality. My only sticking point is the term vaccine injury, its not used in clinical trials. I do understand why people use the term, to highlight potential Adverse Events that are more extreme. I did enjoy the conversation ;-) Keep up the good work!
Oh, the vaccine injury term thing isn't a hill I was dying on. I try to use the terminology of the people I'm speaking with to avoid unnecessary communication problems.
I was just trying to illustrate that assuming an "adverse event" is due to a "vaccine injury" is like assuming something correctly called a UFO must therefore be a space alien. That's a very specific mistake that's being made here that I think contributes to a lot of the confusion regarding VAERS and what that data is actually representing.
Agreed.