Re-reading this, you're right. 3% of the problematic cases reported were deaths but the doc doesn't say how many injectees were non-problematic. Unfortunately there is a "b4" code censoring the number of doses administered in the study. I'll delete this post shortly as it's misleading. My bad.
Yeah, good idea. My guess is, its around 0.5 % for short term fatality which is consistent with the toxicity of batches. Long term - anyone's guess. To redpill people we need to hunt for information Pfizer already knew about long term problems. This will be the eye opener, since otherwise people just say "Well all my family took it and nothing happened"
Before we spread this far and wide we have to clarify something.
Relevant Cases (N=42086) - does it refer to all people who were jabbed, or only those who reported problems?
My read is that its only a subset of total jabbed were reported as adverse events. So the 3% fatality is amongst the people who had adverse reactions.
Can someone else verify this?
Re-reading this, you're right. 3% of the problematic cases reported were deaths but the doc doesn't say how many injectees were non-problematic. Unfortunately there is a "b4" code censoring the number of doses administered in the study. I'll delete this post shortly as it's misleading. My bad.
Yeah, good idea. My guess is, its around 0.5 % for short term fatality which is consistent with the toxicity of batches. Long term - anyone's guess. To redpill people we need to hunt for information Pfizer already knew about long term problems. This will be the eye opener, since otherwise people just say "Well all my family took it and nothing happened"
Still though...3% death??? Yeah. And the rate can only increase as study length increases.